.
Feedback

Fee Could Exempt Developers From Building Parking

The initiative is part of a plan to encourage visitors to the downtown area to park their cars just once per visit to reduce traffic on the streets.

Why should developers use up valuable square footage on parking spaces when they can pay the city to build and maintain parking lots elsewhere?

Some city officials want to encourage more developers to take up that philosophy.

Seeking to further a "park once" model in downtown, city officials want to expand a so-called "parking in-lieu fee," where developers volunteer to provide fewer parking spaces than what's required by city code for their buildings. In exchange, they pay a fee to the city that's supposed to fund construction of new public parking.

During a study session Tuesday night, most of the seven-member City Council indicated they are ready to move forward with increasing the scope of the program beyond its current boundaries in the core of downtown, and raising the fee developers would pay to the city instead of building their own parking. But councilman Bobby Shriver, who is not running for reelection when his term ends this year, doubts the fee actually helps encourage shoppers to to only park once during their visit.

"The way you're going to be able to get people to stay in one place, [is when] the things you want are near where you're parking," Shriver said.

The decision will come amid rising community concerns over the volume of new development citywide and criticism over the resulting traffic and limited parking, especially in downtown.

SEE ALSO:

The fees would likely be used to improve current parking options, but not to immediately build new lots and garages. Suggested improvements included a valet program where drivers could leave their car at one end of the city and pick it up at a different location, and installing lighting systems in garages that flash green when a space is available.

Cities commonly use "park once" models to encourage new development, more room on the property for retail or restaurant space, and to reduce street congestion as more people walk.

"I'm constantly encouraged [by] how we’re keeping our eye on the prize for a better, more walkable, more livable, more sustainable downtown area," said councilman Terry O'Day.

Currently, the option to pay the "parking in-lieu fee" is limited to new development in the area bounded by Second Court (alley behind 2nd Street) to the west, Fourth Court to the east, Broadway to the south, and Wilshire Boulevard to the north. The fee is paid annually to the city. It's $1.50 per square foot that was added after 1986 for which parking is not provided. 

The city has reported collecting about $600,000 annually from 44 parcels. There's about $7 million in the account, and it's being used to the fund the .

The existing fee covers just a small fraction of the amount it costs for the city to build new parking spaces—estimated at between $30,000 and $54,000 per space, according to a recent parking study.

The city's consultants, Nelson\Nygaard and AECOM, proposed setting the fee at a flat rate of $20,000 per space and adjusting it annually based on a construction cost index.

Councilman Bob Holbrook said $20,000 would be a "fair fee to start with."

He and Kevin McKeown stressed the importance of the city actually building the parking.

"We can’t collect the fee and not build the parking," said Holbrook. "There won’t be places for those cars to go."

The council is pushing city planning staff to move forward with the program's expansion before the city adopts its new Downtown Specific Plan, which is supposed to address existing parking problems and identify locations where new public spaces could be built.

"If we move this forward, we’re essentially saying, 'don’t worry, you don't have to build all this parking, we’ll take care of it,'" said McKeown.

Stay connected with Santa Monica Patch throughout the day on Facebook and Twitter. Subscribe to our free daily newsletter for email updates.

Chuck Mason September 14, 2012 at 06:56 pm
SM wants more tax revenue from new businesses and residences. They know if they don't require builders to put in enough parking they will be able to ticket more people who are forced to park on the streets.
It's win-win for SM. Oh, and they take money from the developers (perpetual cash flow) in order to build some new parking structure somewhere. That's how a kleptocracy does it. No news here. Avoid SM, if you can. I do, if I can.
Glenn E Grab September 15, 2012 at 01:10 pm
if you don't build enough extra parking, don't allow the businesses to open.....don't worry, they won't want to anyway...
Glenn E Grab September 15, 2012 at 01:12 pm
I only drive to Santa Monica when I know I can get parking....parking on the street is a nightmare...
Jim Gerstley September 15, 2012 at 09:00 pm
Seems to me developers are only going to pay an in lieu fee if it is cheaper for them. Which implies it is going to cost the city more to provide the same amount of parking. Large businesses, such as hotels, must provide sufficient parking for their guests, employees and users of their facilities. Otherwise you will never get the cars off the street to make room for residents, students and potential customers. And street parking is needed to augment the parking structures in order to even approach providing sufficient parking within the city.
Claudia Schafer September 18, 2012 at 11:50 pm
During the Cold War, Nikita Kruschev wryly remarked that if you sell a Capitalist enough rope, he will hang himself. Seems eerily applicable to the City of SaMo.
Glenn E Grab September 19, 2012 at 04:53 am
do these morons actually think people will park their cars a few miles away and take a shuttle?...

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Santa Monica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
stewart resmer June 18, 2013 at 02:35 pm
Vice President Joe Biden tried Tuesday to rally Congress to act on gun control legislation, sayingRead More that "the country has changed and [politicians] will pay a political price for not getting engaged and dealing with gun safety." "As proud as the president and I am of the progress we have made, we need Congress to act," Biden said in a speech delivered at the White House. "The American people are demanding it. We need to make sure that the voices of the ones we lost are the loudest ones we here in this fight." Specifically, Biden was referring to politicians like Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-NH), who saw her approval rating plummet after she voted against legislation that would expand background checks. Sen. Jeff Flake's (R-AZ) and Sen. Mark Begich's (D-AK) ratings also took a nosedive. On the otherside, Democrats in red states, like Sens. Mary Landrieu (LA) and Kay Hagan (NC), got a slight boost in their approval ratings after they voted in favor of the gun control legislation. The vice president also released a set of federal guidelines Tuesday for developing high quality emergency operations for schools, higher education institutions and places of worship. "We made sure the guide reflects all the lessons we've learned over the years," he said.
Joanne June 14, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Read it! Agree! Let's go!!!
Joanne June 14, 2013 at 12:39 pm
Also, check out the Santa Monica Mirror coverage of the Chamber of Commerce Installation, where itRead More was held and who was present!!!
Joanne June 14, 2013 at 12:41 pm
Talk about "sleeping with the enemy".....just sayin'
Fran Beeler June 7, 2013 at 07:28 am
They opened a new store upstairs at the corner of Sawtelle/Olympic Blvds. (Marshall's, Starbucks)
V.P.A. June 9, 2013 at 06:28 am
Was the question was about a STORE or a question about the Restaurant 'Michaels'?
Michelle June 18, 2013 at 06:33 am
The store. Thanks!