Fee Proposed for Cleaner Water

Tax hike proposal could be mistaken for junk mail, a county supervisor warns.

A Los Angeles County supervisor today urged people to learn about a proposed fee to pay for clean water programs.

"This is a tax increase proposal," Supervisor Michael Antonovich said, warning that a recent mailing about the fee looks like junk mail. "Don't throw it away."

The notice of the Clean Water, Clean Beaches Measure tells property owners how much each would pay annually and includes a form for objecting to the idea.

A typical single-family homeowner would pay about $54 on average and condominium owners $20 or less, according to Phil Doudar, project manager for the initiative. About 90 percent of parcel owners would likely pay less than $100, though large commercial property owners could pay thousands of dollars.

If approved, property owners would be charged an annual fee to cover costs associated with improving water quality and reducing pollution from urban runoff.

The city of Santa Monica already assesses two parcel fees annually on all property owners, generating about $3.9 million a year to improve water quality, maintain storm drains and meet federal and state Clean Water Act regulations.

Department of Public Works Director Gail Farber warned earlier this year that county waterways are choked with trash, infection-causing bacteria, toxic chemicals, lead, copper and other metals, oil and grease.

As proposed, the county measure would raise about $276 million annually to be split between Los Angeles County's Flood Control District, nine watershed areas
set up to manage clean-up projects and the rest of the cities that make up the

The Flood Control District spent an estimated $340 million to control pollutants in fiscal year 2010-11, according to Farber, who has estimated the cost of complying with existing water-quality regulations to be in the billions of dollars.

But Antonovich and Supervisor Don Knabe objected to what they called a tax on residents, saying funding should come from the federal or state government.

Antonovich and Knabe voted against the proposal in July, arguing that it should be put to voters in a future election rather than to property owners via a mail-in ballot.

"It really is disingenuous," Knabe said today. "Clearly the intent of this piece of mail is to look like junk mail."

Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky, who backs the measure—the result of years of consensus building between municipalities and environmentalists—disagreed, saying it looks much like rate increase notices from local utilities.

The notice is just the first step in the approval process. A public hearing on the matter is scheduled for Jan. 15 during the board's regular weekly meeting at 9:30 a.m.

If a majority of property owners protest the fee in writing before the end of that meeting, the fee will not be imposed. If a majority do not object, a ballot would be mailed to property owners. And if a majority of ballots returned are in favor of the measure, the fee would be charged.

More information is available at lacountycleanwater.org.

— Patch editor Jenna Chandler contributed to this report.

Douglas Fay December 05, 2012 at 05:45 AM
I strongly disagree with "the result of years of consensus building between municipalities and environmentalists" statement by Supervisor Yaroslavsky. There is no consensus between environmentalists and the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission, which the County has had an active roll in. No cooperation whatsoever has occurred. This is nothing more than a con job by consummate politicians and the like. A complete sham.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »