.
Feedback

Alt-Car Alternatives

Hybrid and electric cars will not scale up quickly enough to meet our future transportation challenges.

The electric car has been a fixation of many within the modern environmental movement. Magazines, blogs, and the AltCar Expo in Santa Monica, which will have just passed by the time you are reading this, often drool over the latest electric and hybrid wonders.

I think there are some worthwhile advantages to using electric motors over combustion engines, and as long as cars are around I think we ought to be transitioning how they are powered. However I strongly believe the merits and advantages of converting to electric cars are overstated in light of the problems with trying to perpetuate car centric, and car dependent living, that go far beyond just emissions and fuel source, as well as the financial and resource limits we face.


I know I will take some heat for expressing these views in a town that has put as much weight behind electric and alternative vehicles as Santa Monica, but I felt that someone had to talk about the problems facing a conversion to such cars, and from an environmentalist perspective.

Let’s say hypothetically that tomorrow everyone in the Los Angeles region with a gasoline powered car suddenly had a fully electric car, the batteries doubled in charge life, and a renewable energy grid drops out of the sky leaving free solar panels on every home to power the cars. We would still have the same congestion, quality of life, and public safety problems we have because of car dependent society today. The 405 would be no less a headache. The death toll on our roads would be no less catastrophic.

A report from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration concluded hybrid and electric cars pose a greater risk to pedestrians and cyclists because of their quiet engines. The first documented case of an American pedestrian being killed by an automobile driver, on Sept. 13, 1899, was hit by an electric car.

We would still have to maintain all the roads and over-sized highways being pounded by heavy traffic, at tremendous and increasingly unsustainable public cost to finance. New taxes would have to be created just to keep the whole roadway system from falling apart all together because the gas tax funds, which are already in decline, and pay for about half of highway spending, would suddenly evaporate.

Maintaining such a car fleet, with so many batteries utilizing rare earth metals, which are also finite and from a select few geographic locations, would still leave behind formidable environmental, economic, and international political dilemmas as all the batteries had to be replaced eventually.

I worry the enthusiasm for drumming up electric cars sets up an unrealistic expectation that we can keep our automobile centric lifestyle going unchanged, just powered by other means. Cars are an inherently inefficient and tremendously expensive (for private and public spending) means of transportation in urban centers, regardless of what powers them.

Given the direction of global oil production, political instability, and the economy, I do not believe it is even possible, let alone a desirable outcome, to convert the majority of the U.S. vehicle fleet to electric and hybrid cars in the time necessary for a smooth transition off oil.

With hybrid & EV’s sales representing only a tiny fraction of new sales, figures that have been stagnant for the past year, it could take essentially forever to have an all hybrid and electric American car fleet. To replace all 250+ million vehicles in the U.S. with hybrid and electric cars at the current sales rate of about 25,000 of such vehicles annually, according to my back of the napkin math, it would take about 10,000 years!

Those expecting an era of fossil fuel independence to arrive by car better start hoping those hybrid and EV car sales pick up fast, really fast, or they will be sorely disappointed.

Now I am not entirely down on alternative cars, but I see their adoption on a smaller scale than I think many advocates for these vehicles are hoping. Where I see the application of hybrid and electric cars having the greatest value, is getting them into car rental fleets, , taxi cab services and government shared use fleets. Such systems can serve many people with far fewer cars than individual ownership, and therefore it is much more feasible to scale up alternative vehicles for those applications.

As for other alt-car ideas, like bio fuels, and hydrogen fuel cells, they all have problems in trying to scale to meet American driving habits. Ethanol being blended into gasoline is already driving up global food price indexes, contributing to riots in poorer nations that depend on food imports. Hydrogen is energy intensive to produce and does not represent a net gain, it is merely an alternative medium for containing energy spent elsewhere. Energy that today mostly comes burning CO2 intensive coal, the same dilemma electric vehicles face.

If America wanted to preserve for my generation, and those that follow, a living pattern based around private motoring that was not dependent on diminishing finite resources, we have done too little, too late. That should have started in earnest during the 70’s when we got our first wake up call during the oil embargo.

The increasingly volatile oil market spiked to all time highs in 2008 just before the market crash. While this year’s did not reach quite as high, the new floor on prices has moved up considerbly. The United States is on track this year to spend more money on gasoline, $491 billion, than ever before.

If we are to successfully transition toward a post-petroleum dependent society, we have to focus on solutions that can be scaled up quickly enough to make a meaningful difference before prices skyrocket again or supply becomes disrupted. Risks I consider more likely to happen sooner than later after spending a lot of time following world energy news in the past year.

That means we need more investments in walkable bikeable neighborhoods, public transit, and intercity rail. Things like building expensive and parking garages at tens of millions of dollars, designed primarily to attract oil consuming cars, and calling them LEED certifiably green because we stuck in a few electrical outlets for plug in EV's, is not what I consider a valuable investment for a future of diminishing oil supply.

Los Angeles was a global leader of electric rail service in the 1920’s (check out the map of the L.A. rail network in 1925), and we could do it again rather quickly if we dropped the futile diminishing returns of more billion dollar freeway expansions and parking lot building, and got on with the real work that needs to be done. Electric rail is the most energy efficient means on land to move people and freight quickly, with far greater prospects for renewable energy supplies than automobiles and trucks.

We don’t need to sell a fleet of alt-cars to Americans maxed on debt, putting them deeper under water (sub-prime car loans are the new sub-prime mortgages). We need cost effective walkable neighborhoods, a backbone of efficient rail lines, timely bus service, and safe bike routes. Then driving becomes optional, rather than something people in Los Angeles County often feel compelled to do currently.

It worries me that selling expensive consumer goods like new cars, by wrapping them in a “green” banner, that we are losing the populism and accessibility of environmentalism. Going green becomes warped into an elite activity, with the flashiest new green technology becoming status symbols.

Really a much more sustainable option than buying a new electric car, from a life-cycle perspective, is often keeping an existing car, having proper tire pressure for it, learning to get by driving it less often, and car pooling when possible.

Sustainable transportation doesn’t have to involve rocket science, lithium ion, and costly monthly payments. It can be as simple as a good pair of walking shoes, a bike, and a transit pass. If we want those options to be more pleasant, safe, and timely, it's not going to happen unless we decide to shift our priorities.

I believe we will eventually view alternatives to driving as necessities in America, whether by choice or forced by unfortunate circumstance. Hopefully we plan appropriately, the time for kicking cans down the road is long gone.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Santa Monica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Eddie Greenberg May 8, 2013 at 09:09 pm
Thank you Marilyn Wexler. I totally agree with all that you have said in this eloquent letter. SMPDRead More have done well in DUI checkpoints for the past few years and they are appreciated for doing so. We are all better off for their efforts!
Aaron Mirsky April 11, 2013 at 06:26 pm
Great letter! Mr. Hill, you have a wonderful perspective and attitude. I am relatively new hear, myRead More family moved to Santa Monica in 1976. I cherish my memories at Santa Monica Beach and hope to continue to "refresh my soul" for many years to come.
Steven Rosen April 10, 2013 at 01:43 pm
Beautiful letter and I under his perspective. But I think if you look at the Quality of Life from aRead More generic standpoint (if there is such a thing), I don't think we headed in an upward trajectory. I cannot imagine more traffic, and new skyline created by tall buildings and newly-required traffic management to make the Quality of Life better for any of us.
Stodj April 9, 2013 at 04:41 pm
Lovely comment. I sense from your letter a new perspective on why this growth is happening, besidesRead More the $ involved, everyone needs to refresh their souls in this time of history and Santa Monica does that...at least at the beach where, hopefully, building will not progress. We do need to focus on halting the height of buildings as that will seriously change the environment here. Thanks, Michael.
karen April 11, 2013 at 11:02 pm
I left Santa Monica in 1987. I went to Samohi and Lincoln, worked at Sears and loved the small townRead More feel. Yes it's changed, but so has everywhere else. If my kids were young enough to drag along I would move there in a heartbeat. If you don't like it anymore, don't visit. I don't really understand why anyone would write to a local media outlet and complain about the town. How insulting. I'll take SM over the Bay area (talk about expensive!) any day.
SantaMonicaNative April 8, 2013 at 07:02 pm
Continued (sorry) The city changes. More people, more housing needed. More people more cars, moreRead More traffic, more trash, more dogs. Next we get the commercial builders who see Santa Monica as a cashbox. In city where 10 stories is tall, we get money hungery people who don't live here, who think 20 stories is better. That's where we are now. A turning point in the city. Once you build them you can't take them back. The city will change even more with the Expo line. We can't stop change, we can't restrict building except through zoning. We can temper it. What we can do is shop locally to save the few local businesses that remain and call City Hall on over ambitious projects. Speak up! It's frustrating-they don't listen but eventually they can be voted out. Don't let Santa Monica turn into Beverly Hills by the sea. We need normal businesses we can afford. Places to eat that you don't need a loan. Stop voting for group politics, read the ballot, get involved, even if only on a personal level. Know your city, don't just complain.
SantaMonicaNative April 8, 2013 at 06:47 pm
My parents loved Santa Monica, the first place i remember was a huge old house on 4th and MontannaRead More which had been subivided into units. If my parents had kept all the properties they owned in this city, i'd be rich. That said i must admit i still love Santa Monica. Go back to any city you grew up in and you will be shocked by the change. Part of the change has to do with the congested state if Caliornia. There are more people, no doubt of that. The other thing is memory tends to blur the facts. The things that matter to an adult are meaningless to a child. There are so many things that have disppeared from this city but they have been replaced by other things. Nothing but bugs are ixed in amber,cities can't be. In addition to that, Santa Monica has not grown in a natural fashion. The City Council has intervened in the natural growth of the city with laws, taxes and programs to fashion a city THEY want, not necessarily what would have been. The city has been pushed into a schitzophrenic combination of high ideals and directed outcomes. Rent control remade the city, changing it from a city with children and families to single renters. Vacancy decontrol helped to change that. Mom and pop owners are almost gone. Few small businesses can exist here, they can't compete with chains The city favors tenants over landlords, lawyers are expensive so properties get sold, torn down and replaced by multiple units. Low income housing increases the density of neighborhoods.
Steve Herbert April 10, 2013 at 08:12 pm
Many folks say the biking is not for them, therefore it can't work for everyone. What should theyRead More should say is it may not work for them but if a larger percentage of those who can ride would, the total numberof drivers would be reduced as more of them are out of their cars and riding bikes. Also consider if you can afford to drive a car you very likely can afford an electric bike. These "hybrids" are a nice blend of an electric motor with a bicycle which can provide as much or as little assistance as the rider prefers. As they still qualify as bikes so you can use and benefit from the bike lanes, but as they are electric they can help those with arthritis, sciatica and other people make the impossible, possible.
RJ April 9, 2013 at 06:18 pm
...ditto Paul!
RJ April 9, 2013 at 06:17 pm
.....Barbara, you forgot to add the need to eliminate about half of the population in Santa MonicaRead More before one could "rediscover" the sleepy beach town it used to be. Then don't forget the other "bike riders" that drive just a crazy as some automobile drivers....failing to abide by the rules of the road...and law! Unfortunately city officials have been trying to squeeze 10 pounds of garbage into 5 pound bags for the last 20 years....then come up with bright ideas like proposing to build movie theaters that enter/empty right on to 4th Street at Arizona (after tearing down the City parking garage) were we all know every idiot that has been issued a driver's license will stop and hold up traffic to drop off their kids...only to return to do it all over again when picking them up. Heaven forbid their kids have to walk from a block away where the parent could avoid blocking traffic on one of the busiest main thoroughfare streets in the city. I’m sure you could come up with many more examples of the most insane development that has happened or is proposed to happen. So Barbara......where is that area with "no congestion"???
Jonathan Friedman April 10, 2013 at 04:08 am
Good luck Jessica. Watch out for Jerry.
Paul S April 10, 2013 at 01:47 am
Don't correct it Jerry - it's very you and we all knew what you meant- and it was fine
Jerry Rubin April 10, 2013 at 01:16 am
CORRECTING my previous comment: Welcome Jessica!
Chris Loos April 4, 2013 at 04:00 pm
When the Expo line is complete and people start using it to travel back and forth from Santa MonicaRead More to DTLA, I think the idea of going without a car (or getting by with 1 car per household instead of 2) will seem mainstream to many more people.
Michael April 4, 2013 at 03:33 pm
3) Getting folks to part with their cars is like forcing divorce upon a couple rapturously in loveRead More 40 minute commute from Santa Monica to Downtown LA on the Expo Line!! Where do I sign up? I will be one of the first to move to a residence within walking distance of a Santa Monica Expo Station. If not having a parking space makes my rent cheaper I have no problem selling my car.
Chris Loos April 4, 2013 at 01:43 pm
Great article Juan!
Glenn E Grab March 30, 2013 at 02:12 pm
last week it took me 1 hour and 15 minutes to go from Sepulveda and Culver to the Lemlee Theatre onRead More 2nd street at 3:30 on Sunday afternoon...I can ride my bike there in 30 minutes...the only reason I took my car was because I went with two friends...one of whom was temporarily on crutches..we griped at him the whole evening..
mimi March 29, 2013 at 02:22 am
There is another travel option for the disabled called Access Services. They transport all over losRead More angeles and neighboring suburbs. You may want to check them out. You are fortunate to have a friend who transports you around instead of riding with WISE, which you dislike.. You could be of great help to your friend if you used Google Directions (before you leave home) to find various routes to your destination. I am familiar with the Chez Jay location on Ocean Ave. There are better and worse ways to get there. I suggest you choose better. Of course, this requires advance planning and a bit of home work. Think of all the aggravation you will save yourself and your friend. The choice is yours.
Dan Charney March 29, 2013 at 02:21 am
Well said- I never go downtown - haven't for almost ten or more years- once every few years I go toRead More the Genius Bar- take the bus-( which no longer runs on my street)- I have been going to Chez Jay almost 40 years or more- I used to work out on the bluffs- can't do any shopping anywhere near Wilshire or Montana- I can walk to Main - get my groceries at night- what is happening here is no different than what is happening in Congress and to our entire country- the rich are doing as they wish - the rest of us can die- the building that will be gone soon will be any with low income tenants and shabby houses- all gone