.
Feedback

Bike Action Plan Enters Home Stretch

A complete draft of the Santa Monica Bike Action plan is out and making its way through various commissions and the city council for final input.

After several scheduling shifts and cramming in last-minute tweaks, the Santa Monica Bike Action Plan is nearing adoption. On Tuesday, the will review the plan, a full draft of which is finally available to the public. After giving their input, the plan goes through one final (hopefully) round to various city commissions, after which adoption by the council will be decided at a following meeting.

It’s been quite a process getting to this point, but it’s really exciting to finally see things moving into place and momentum build, and see how my own involvement in advocating for bikes recent years, and those of others I know, has directly shaped the plan. My very was writing about the first public meeting soliciting input to shape the document.

There was a long time where I felt the city government just didn’t get it. Digging through the 300-or-so-page planning document this week, I can now confidently say the city gets it. The projects in the five-year implementation portion of the plan would put us on a path to make bicycling transportation viable and comfortable for many more Santa Monicans (63 percent of whom already own bikes), as well as the many visitors to our city.

The five-year implementation vision for the plan calls for a mix of new routes, and improving upon and filling gaps in existing routes. Creating better connections between the beach path and the rest of the city is a high priority. Some streets, like Broadway, which already has a bike lane and some of the highest ridership in the city, is slated to have more space allocated to give more of a buffer between cyclists and the hazard of opening car doors and vehicles pulling out of parking spaces and driveways. Sharrow markings will be added to Broadway in the downtown.

There are also a number of programs that go beyond the infrastructure, like emphasizing the need for improved bike education among all road users. Some neighborhood streets, like Michigan, which connects to the high school, will become what are called "neighborhood greenways," where traffic-calming will slow vehicle speeds, reduce cut through traffic and become more inviting and safer for cyclists and pedestrians.

Perhaps the best indication that Santa Monica is on the right track starts just by glancing at the cover. It’s being called an "action" plan. That is a key word, because ambitious bicycle plans penned all over the country have had a bad track record of being more like shelf plans. Plans that sounded like nice things to do, but were shelved at the slightest difficulty and never fully implemented.

The will to actually spend money implementing well-planned intentions is often a limiting factor. In Santa Monica, the allocation of budgeting that has already been approved, and a number of grants already secured, means this plan truly is ready for action and can hit the ground running.

Adopting the plan truly is only the start of the process, though. I’m sure there will be some challenges. They may be budget concerns for the more ambitious improvements, like segments of fully separated paths known as cycle tracks; or restoring the freeway bridge to the high school, a major capital project called for in the long-term, 20-year plan.

Some projects may experience pushback by some stakeholders opposed to street changes. What ever the hurdles, ensuring this plan really moves from paper to the street will require public outreach by the staff, continued involvement of political leaders on the council and various commissions, and support from members of the community who believe in this vision.

While there are many important aspects to the LUCE general plan, it is my belief that fulfilling the bike plan component will be one of the most important and transformative, for several reasons. There are things like cutting congestion, boosting the local economy, improved health, cleaner air, etc., but first and foremost is public safety. While contentious to some at first, the reconfiguration of part of Ocean Park Boulevard.

In 2008, something called a road diet—taking a two-lanes-each-way road and dropping it to one each way, with a center turn lane and bike lanes—reduced collisions of all kinds, not just those involving bicyclists, by half. At the same time, bicycle ridership from road count comparisons between 2007 and '10 showed a 95 percent increase, and some intersections like Ocean Park and 17th saw a 215 percent increase in riders. Travel times for cars were little impacted despite the reduction in general use lanes.

There is still time to give some input, and there are minor things here and there I’d like propose addressing as well, but this is a solid plan that I cannot wait to see enacted. The full Santa Monica Bike Action Plan can be viewed here (be aware it is a hefty PDF document). Feedback is being collected by the group Santa Monica Spoke (I’m a steering committee member of Spoke) to consider in prioritizing advocacy efforts. E-mail BikePlan@SMSpoke.org or send messages directly to the city of Santa Monica at shapethefuture2025@smgov.net.

If the hundreds and sometimes thousands of bikes parked for events in the city where bike valet is offered, and the half of students at Samohi riding on Bike It Day, are any indication, Santa Monicans are ready. So let's get this plan passed, get out the buckets of paint and start painting the town bike-friendly.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Santa Monica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
j pena May 23, 2013 at 09:19 am
The City Council and Planning Commission have given our city away to billionaire developers andRead More business. Developers should be footing the bills. They need to stop rolling over to the likes of Dell, owner of the Miramar, who ripped off the city for several million dollars already. Instead they are considering letting him build 150 5 million $ luxury condos at the Miramar. In a residential neighborhood, a 22 story eyesore at our city gate.
Eddie Greenberg May 8, 2013 at 09:09 pm
Thank you Marilyn Wexler. I totally agree with all that you have said in this eloquent letter. SMPDRead More have done well in DUI checkpoints for the past few years and they are appreciated for doing so. We are all better off for their efforts!
Aaron Mirsky April 11, 2013 at 06:26 pm
Great letter! Mr. Hill, you have a wonderful perspective and attitude. I am relatively new hear, myRead More family moved to Santa Monica in 1976. I cherish my memories at Santa Monica Beach and hope to continue to "refresh my soul" for many years to come.
Steven Rosen April 10, 2013 at 01:43 pm
Beautiful letter and I under his perspective. But I think if you look at the Quality of Life from aRead More generic standpoint (if there is such a thing), I don't think we headed in an upward trajectory. I cannot imagine more traffic, and new skyline created by tall buildings and newly-required traffic management to make the Quality of Life better for any of us.
Stodj April 9, 2013 at 04:41 pm
Lovely comment. I sense from your letter a new perspective on why this growth is happening, besidesRead More the $ involved, everyone needs to refresh their souls in this time of history and Santa Monica does that...at least at the beach where, hopefully, building will not progress. We do need to focus on halting the height of buildings as that will seriously change the environment here. Thanks, Michael.
karen April 11, 2013 at 11:02 pm
I left Santa Monica in 1987. I went to Samohi and Lincoln, worked at Sears and loved the small townRead More feel. Yes it's changed, but so has everywhere else. If my kids were young enough to drag along I would move there in a heartbeat. If you don't like it anymore, don't visit. I don't really understand why anyone would write to a local media outlet and complain about the town. How insulting. I'll take SM over the Bay area (talk about expensive!) any day.
SantaMonicaNative April 8, 2013 at 07:02 pm
Continued (sorry) The city changes. More people, more housing needed. More people more cars, moreRead More traffic, more trash, more dogs. Next we get the commercial builders who see Santa Monica as a cashbox. In city where 10 stories is tall, we get money hungery people who don't live here, who think 20 stories is better. That's where we are now. A turning point in the city. Once you build them you can't take them back. The city will change even more with the Expo line. We can't stop change, we can't restrict building except through zoning. We can temper it. What we can do is shop locally to save the few local businesses that remain and call City Hall on over ambitious projects. Speak up! It's frustrating-they don't listen but eventually they can be voted out. Don't let Santa Monica turn into Beverly Hills by the sea. We need normal businesses we can afford. Places to eat that you don't need a loan. Stop voting for group politics, read the ballot, get involved, even if only on a personal level. Know your city, don't just complain.
SantaMonicaNative April 8, 2013 at 06:47 pm
My parents loved Santa Monica, the first place i remember was a huge old house on 4th and MontannaRead More which had been subivided into units. If my parents had kept all the properties they owned in this city, i'd be rich. That said i must admit i still love Santa Monica. Go back to any city you grew up in and you will be shocked by the change. Part of the change has to do with the congested state if Caliornia. There are more people, no doubt of that. The other thing is memory tends to blur the facts. The things that matter to an adult are meaningless to a child. There are so many things that have disppeared from this city but they have been replaced by other things. Nothing but bugs are ixed in amber,cities can't be. In addition to that, Santa Monica has not grown in a natural fashion. The City Council has intervened in the natural growth of the city with laws, taxes and programs to fashion a city THEY want, not necessarily what would have been. The city has been pushed into a schitzophrenic combination of high ideals and directed outcomes. Rent control remade the city, changing it from a city with children and families to single renters. Vacancy decontrol helped to change that. Mom and pop owners are almost gone. Few small businesses can exist here, they can't compete with chains The city favors tenants over landlords, lawyers are expensive so properties get sold, torn down and replaced by multiple units. Low income housing increases the density of neighborhoods.
Steve Herbert April 10, 2013 at 08:12 pm
Many folks say the biking is not for them, therefore it can't work for everyone. What should theyRead More should say is it may not work for them but if a larger percentage of those who can ride would, the total numberof drivers would be reduced as more of them are out of their cars and riding bikes. Also consider if you can afford to drive a car you very likely can afford an electric bike. These "hybrids" are a nice blend of an electric motor with a bicycle which can provide as much or as little assistance as the rider prefers. As they still qualify as bikes so you can use and benefit from the bike lanes, but as they are electric they can help those with arthritis, sciatica and other people make the impossible, possible.
RJ April 9, 2013 at 06:18 pm
...ditto Paul!
RJ April 9, 2013 at 06:17 pm
.....Barbara, you forgot to add the need to eliminate about half of the population in Santa MonicaRead More before one could "rediscover" the sleepy beach town it used to be. Then don't forget the other "bike riders" that drive just a crazy as some automobile drivers....failing to abide by the rules of the road...and law! Unfortunately city officials have been trying to squeeze 10 pounds of garbage into 5 pound bags for the last 20 years....then come up with bright ideas like proposing to build movie theaters that enter/empty right on to 4th Street at Arizona (after tearing down the City parking garage) were we all know every idiot that has been issued a driver's license will stop and hold up traffic to drop off their kids...only to return to do it all over again when picking them up. Heaven forbid their kids have to walk from a block away where the parent could avoid blocking traffic on one of the busiest main thoroughfare streets in the city. I’m sure you could come up with many more examples of the most insane development that has happened or is proposed to happen. So Barbara......where is that area with "no congestion"???
Jonathan Friedman April 10, 2013 at 04:08 am
Good luck Jessica. Watch out for Jerry.
Paul S April 10, 2013 at 01:47 am
Don't correct it Jerry - it's very you and we all knew what you meant- and it was fine
Jerry Rubin April 10, 2013 at 01:16 am
CORRECTING my previous comment: Welcome Jessica!
Chris Loos April 4, 2013 at 04:00 pm
When the Expo line is complete and people start using it to travel back and forth from Santa MonicaRead More to DTLA, I think the idea of going without a car (or getting by with 1 car per household instead of 2) will seem mainstream to many more people.
Michael April 4, 2013 at 03:33 pm
3) Getting folks to part with their cars is like forcing divorce upon a couple rapturously in loveRead More 40 minute commute from Santa Monica to Downtown LA on the Expo Line!! Where do I sign up? I will be one of the first to move to a residence within walking distance of a Santa Monica Expo Station. If not having a parking space makes my rent cheaper I have no problem selling my car.
Chris Loos April 4, 2013 at 01:43 pm
Great article Juan!
Glenn E Grab March 30, 2013 at 02:12 pm
last week it took me 1 hour and 15 minutes to go from Sepulveda and Culver to the Lemlee Theatre onRead More 2nd street at 3:30 on Sunday afternoon...I can ride my bike there in 30 minutes...the only reason I took my car was because I went with two friends...one of whom was temporarily on crutches..we griped at him the whole evening..
mimi March 29, 2013 at 02:22 am
There is another travel option for the disabled called Access Services. They transport all over losRead More angeles and neighboring suburbs. You may want to check them out. You are fortunate to have a friend who transports you around instead of riding with WISE, which you dislike.. You could be of great help to your friend if you used Google Directions (before you leave home) to find various routes to your destination. I am familiar with the Chez Jay location on Ocean Ave. There are better and worse ways to get there. I suggest you choose better. Of course, this requires advance planning and a bit of home work. Think of all the aggravation you will save yourself and your friend. The choice is yours.
Dan Charney March 29, 2013 at 02:21 am
Well said- I never go downtown - haven't for almost ten or more years- once every few years I go toRead More the Genius Bar- take the bus-( which no longer runs on my street)- I have been going to Chez Jay almost 40 years or more- I used to work out on the bluffs- can't do any shopping anywhere near Wilshire or Montana- I can walk to Main - get my groceries at night- what is happening here is no different than what is happening in Congress and to our entire country- the rich are doing as they wish - the rest of us can die- the building that will be gone soon will be any with low income tenants and shabby houses- all gone