.
Feedback

LA City Council Passes Rosendahl's Resolution on Santa Monica Airport

"The airport needs to be shut down," he tells Santa Monica Patch.

Los Angeles Councilman Bill Rosendahl's effort to lower the amount of noise and pollution at took a step forward on Wednesday. During its morning meeting, the Los Angeles City Council voted unanimously in favor of a related resolution he crafted with Councilwoman Janice Hahn.

"Great news!" Rosendahl said in a Facebook post and a Tweet. "This morning my council colleagues voted to send a strong message to Congress: No more noise and pollution at SMO!"

Rosendahl told Santa Monica Patch on Wednesday evening that he expects Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa will support the resolution.

"My long-range objective is that the airport needs to be shut down," he added.

The resolution proposes changing the departure path at SMO and shutting down the airport’s six . Following the council's vote, the resolution will be included in the City of Los Angeles' 2011-2012 Federal Legislative Program.

The resolution also calls for shutting down the six flight schools at SMO. Hahn previously said she was concerned about pilots-in-training performing dangerous maneuvers over densely populated areas.

“We should close down those schools at SMO and move them to a safer location," she said.

, founder of CRAAP, cheered Wednesday's advancement of the resolution.

"SMO has impacted the lives of Westside residents for decades, and residents surrounding the airport have complained about the noise the airport generates and more recently about safety hazards, toxic jet pollution and lead pollution from piston aircraft," he said. "Los Angeles residents have felt frustrated that their complaints to Santa Monica officials have fallen on deaf ears.”

Residents in Santa Monica and surrounding areas have with the highly concentrated jet-fuel emissions from aircraft that idle on the runway at the airport while they wait for commercial jets from LAX to clear the airspace.

Ultrafine-particle emissions are nearly three to 10 times higher than normal within 2,000 feet of SMO, according to a UCLA study released in November 2009.

Last year, former Congresswoman Jane Harman set up a six-month test to examine the impacts of jets flying over Santa Monica instead of on the LAX flight paths.

"The toxicity of the jets idling was no longer happening," Rosendahl said.

In 1990, the City of Santa Monica asked the to divert planes to fly over the ocean "so as not to upset Santa Monica residents," Rubin said.

Rosendahl said that if the departure path is altered, there will be more pressure on the to close the airport.

"When Jane Harman convinced the FAA to vector to the right for six months, it caused an uproar in Santa Monica, and caused [Congressman Henry] Waxman to hold meetings with Santa Monica constituents and my constituents. [He] would get the same blowback that he got from them before."

Rosendahl reiterated the outrage he hears from his constituents regarding planes flying over areas outside of Santa Monica.

"I'm one elected [representative] for 300,000 people," he said. "Santa Monica has seven elected [City Council members] for 80,000 people. "If they had the same concerns from their constituents that I have, they'll [shut down SMO].

"I used to live under the flight pattern north of Rose [Ave.] for five years, and I couldn't understand why it didn't fly over [Santa Monica]."

[Editor's note: According to the latest census data, Santa Monica's population was 89,736 as of 2010.]

In a previous motion, Rosendahl said, "We can't sit and wait anymore for the FAA to make this change. We need to start lobbying Washington, D.C., for a permanent solution to the suffocating jet emissions from Santa Monica Airport.”

"The FAA doesn't call the shots," he added to Santa Monica Patch on Wednesday night. "They're told what to do by the policymakers in Washington, and the Senate and House, and the president."

In late January, a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., sided with the FAA, rejecting Santa Monica's years-long effort to ban the fastest, largest (category C and D) jets from SMO. The Santa Monica City Council unanimously passed the C and D ban in March 2008, but the FAA immediately got an injunction against the ban, and the fast jets have continued using SMO without interruption.

On Wednesday night, pilots, controllers and mechanics are convening at SMO for a dinner and meeting with Craig Fuller, president of the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association. SMO-related issues will be discussed at the private affair, which is being hosted by the Friends of Santa Monica Airport.

Meanwhile, in recognition of Earth Day on Friday, protesters will try to increase awareness about the dangers of leaded gasoline being used by propeller planes at SMO. The action, sponsored by the Venice Neighborhood Council's Santa Monica Airport Committee, will take place at Bundy Dr. and Airport Ave., at the east end of the airport.

This article was updated at 6:22 p.m.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Santa Monica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Eddie Greenberg May 8, 2013 at 09:09 pm
Thank you Marilyn Wexler. I totally agree with all that you have said in this eloquent letter. SMPDRead More have done well in DUI checkpoints for the past few years and they are appreciated for doing so. We are all better off for their efforts!
Aaron Mirsky April 11, 2013 at 06:26 pm
Great letter! Mr. Hill, you have a wonderful perspective and attitude. I am relatively new hear, myRead More family moved to Santa Monica in 1976. I cherish my memories at Santa Monica Beach and hope to continue to "refresh my soul" for many years to come.
Steven Rosen April 10, 2013 at 01:43 pm
Beautiful letter and I under his perspective. But I think if you look at the Quality of Life from aRead More generic standpoint (if there is such a thing), I don't think we headed in an upward trajectory. I cannot imagine more traffic, and new skyline created by tall buildings and newly-required traffic management to make the Quality of Life better for any of us.
Stodj April 9, 2013 at 04:41 pm
Lovely comment. I sense from your letter a new perspective on why this growth is happening, besidesRead More the $ involved, everyone needs to refresh their souls in this time of history and Santa Monica does that...at least at the beach where, hopefully, building will not progress. We do need to focus on halting the height of buildings as that will seriously change the environment here. Thanks, Michael.
karen April 11, 2013 at 11:02 pm
I left Santa Monica in 1987. I went to Samohi and Lincoln, worked at Sears and loved the small townRead More feel. Yes it's changed, but so has everywhere else. If my kids were young enough to drag along I would move there in a heartbeat. If you don't like it anymore, don't visit. I don't really understand why anyone would write to a local media outlet and complain about the town. How insulting. I'll take SM over the Bay area (talk about expensive!) any day.
SantaMonicaNative April 8, 2013 at 07:02 pm
Continued (sorry) The city changes. More people, more housing needed. More people more cars, moreRead More traffic, more trash, more dogs. Next we get the commercial builders who see Santa Monica as a cashbox. In city where 10 stories is tall, we get money hungery people who don't live here, who think 20 stories is better. That's where we are now. A turning point in the city. Once you build them you can't take them back. The city will change even more with the Expo line. We can't stop change, we can't restrict building except through zoning. We can temper it. What we can do is shop locally to save the few local businesses that remain and call City Hall on over ambitious projects. Speak up! It's frustrating-they don't listen but eventually they can be voted out. Don't let Santa Monica turn into Beverly Hills by the sea. We need normal businesses we can afford. Places to eat that you don't need a loan. Stop voting for group politics, read the ballot, get involved, even if only on a personal level. Know your city, don't just complain.
SantaMonicaNative April 8, 2013 at 06:47 pm
My parents loved Santa Monica, the first place i remember was a huge old house on 4th and MontannaRead More which had been subivided into units. If my parents had kept all the properties they owned in this city, i'd be rich. That said i must admit i still love Santa Monica. Go back to any city you grew up in and you will be shocked by the change. Part of the change has to do with the congested state if Caliornia. There are more people, no doubt of that. The other thing is memory tends to blur the facts. The things that matter to an adult are meaningless to a child. There are so many things that have disppeared from this city but they have been replaced by other things. Nothing but bugs are ixed in amber,cities can't be. In addition to that, Santa Monica has not grown in a natural fashion. The City Council has intervened in the natural growth of the city with laws, taxes and programs to fashion a city THEY want, not necessarily what would have been. The city has been pushed into a schitzophrenic combination of high ideals and directed outcomes. Rent control remade the city, changing it from a city with children and families to single renters. Vacancy decontrol helped to change that. Mom and pop owners are almost gone. Few small businesses can exist here, they can't compete with chains The city favors tenants over landlords, lawyers are expensive so properties get sold, torn down and replaced by multiple units. Low income housing increases the density of neighborhoods.
Steve Herbert April 10, 2013 at 08:12 pm
Many folks say the biking is not for them, therefore it can't work for everyone. What should theyRead More should say is it may not work for them but if a larger percentage of those who can ride would, the total numberof drivers would be reduced as more of them are out of their cars and riding bikes. Also consider if you can afford to drive a car you very likely can afford an electric bike. These "hybrids" are a nice blend of an electric motor with a bicycle which can provide as much or as little assistance as the rider prefers. As they still qualify as bikes so you can use and benefit from the bike lanes, but as they are electric they can help those with arthritis, sciatica and other people make the impossible, possible.
RJ April 9, 2013 at 06:18 pm
...ditto Paul!
RJ April 9, 2013 at 06:17 pm
.....Barbara, you forgot to add the need to eliminate about half of the population in Santa MonicaRead More before one could "rediscover" the sleepy beach town it used to be. Then don't forget the other "bike riders" that drive just a crazy as some automobile drivers....failing to abide by the rules of the road...and law! Unfortunately city officials have been trying to squeeze 10 pounds of garbage into 5 pound bags for the last 20 years....then come up with bright ideas like proposing to build movie theaters that enter/empty right on to 4th Street at Arizona (after tearing down the City parking garage) were we all know every idiot that has been issued a driver's license will stop and hold up traffic to drop off their kids...only to return to do it all over again when picking them up. Heaven forbid their kids have to walk from a block away where the parent could avoid blocking traffic on one of the busiest main thoroughfare streets in the city. I’m sure you could come up with many more examples of the most insane development that has happened or is proposed to happen. So Barbara......where is that area with "no congestion"???
Jonathan Friedman April 10, 2013 at 04:08 am
Good luck Jessica. Watch out for Jerry.
unknownauthor April 10, 2013 at 01:47 am
Don't correct it Jerry - it's very you and we all knew what you meant- and it was fine
Jerry Rubin April 10, 2013 at 01:16 am
CORRECTING my previous comment: Welcome Jessica!
Chris Loos April 4, 2013 at 04:00 pm
When the Expo line is complete and people start using it to travel back and forth from Santa MonicaRead More to DTLA, I think the idea of going without a car (or getting by with 1 car per household instead of 2) will seem mainstream to many more people.
Michael April 4, 2013 at 03:33 pm
3) Getting folks to part with their cars is like forcing divorce upon a couple rapturously in loveRead More 40 minute commute from Santa Monica to Downtown LA on the Expo Line!! Where do I sign up? I will be one of the first to move to a residence within walking distance of a Santa Monica Expo Station. If not having a parking space makes my rent cheaper I have no problem selling my car.
Chris Loos April 4, 2013 at 01:43 pm
Great article Juan!
Glenn E Grab March 30, 2013 at 02:12 pm
last week it took me 1 hour and 15 minutes to go from Sepulveda and Culver to the Lemlee Theatre onRead More 2nd street at 3:30 on Sunday afternoon...I can ride my bike there in 30 minutes...the only reason I took my car was because I went with two friends...one of whom was temporarily on crutches..we griped at him the whole evening..
mimi March 29, 2013 at 02:22 am
There is another travel option for the disabled called Access Services. They transport all over losRead More angeles and neighboring suburbs. You may want to check them out. You are fortunate to have a friend who transports you around instead of riding with WISE, which you dislike.. You could be of great help to your friend if you used Google Directions (before you leave home) to find various routes to your destination. I am familiar with the Chez Jay location on Ocean Ave. There are better and worse ways to get there. I suggest you choose better. Of course, this requires advance planning and a bit of home work. Think of all the aggravation you will save yourself and your friend. The choice is yours.
Dan Charney March 29, 2013 at 02:21 am
Well said- I never go downtown - haven't for almost ten or more years- once every few years I go toRead More the Genius Bar- take the bus-( which no longer runs on my street)- I have been going to Chez Jay almost 40 years or more- I used to work out on the bluffs- can't do any shopping anywhere near Wilshire or Montana- I can walk to Main - get my groceries at night- what is happening here is no different than what is happening in Congress and to our entire country- the rich are doing as they wish - the rest of us can die- the building that will be gone soon will be any with low income tenants and shabby houses- all gone