LA City Council Passes Rosendahl's Resolution on Santa Monica Airport

"The airport needs to be shut down," he tells Santa Monica Patch.

Los Angeles Councilman Bill Rosendahl's effort to lower the amount of noise and pollution at took a step forward on Wednesday. During its morning meeting, the Los Angeles City Council voted unanimously in favor of a related resolution he crafted with Councilwoman Janice Hahn.

"Great news!" Rosendahl said in a Facebook post and a Tweet. "This morning my council colleagues voted to send a strong message to Congress: No more noise and pollution at SMO!"

Rosendahl told Santa Monica Patch on Wednesday evening that he expects Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa will support the resolution.

"My long-range objective is that the airport needs to be shut down," he added.

The resolution proposes changing the departure path at SMO and shutting down the airport’s six . Following the council's vote, the resolution will be included in the City of Los Angeles' 2011-2012 Federal Legislative Program.

The resolution also calls for shutting down the six flight schools at SMO. Hahn previously said she was concerned about pilots-in-training performing dangerous maneuvers over densely populated areas.

“We should close down those schools at SMO and move them to a safer location," she said.

, founder of CRAAP, cheered Wednesday's advancement of the resolution.

"SMO has impacted the lives of Westside residents for decades, and residents surrounding the airport have complained about the noise the airport generates and more recently about safety hazards, toxic jet pollution and lead pollution from piston aircraft," he said. "Los Angeles residents have felt frustrated that their complaints to Santa Monica officials have fallen on deaf ears.”

Residents in Santa Monica and surrounding areas have with the highly concentrated jet-fuel emissions from aircraft that idle on the runway at the airport while they wait for commercial jets from LAX to clear the airspace.

Ultrafine-particle emissions are nearly three to 10 times higher than normal within 2,000 feet of SMO, according to a UCLA study released in November 2009.

Last year, former Congresswoman Jane Harman set up a six-month test to examine the impacts of jets flying over Santa Monica instead of on the LAX flight paths.

"The toxicity of the jets idling was no longer happening," Rosendahl said.

In 1990, the City of Santa Monica asked the to divert planes to fly over the ocean "so as not to upset Santa Monica residents," Rubin said.

Rosendahl said that if the departure path is altered, there will be more pressure on the to close the airport.

"When Jane Harman convinced the FAA to vector to the right for six months, it caused an uproar in Santa Monica, and caused [Congressman Henry] Waxman to hold meetings with Santa Monica constituents and my constituents. [He] would get the same blowback that he got from them before."

Rosendahl reiterated the outrage he hears from his constituents regarding planes flying over areas outside of Santa Monica.

"I'm one elected [representative] for 300,000 people," he said. "Santa Monica has seven elected [City Council members] for 80,000 people. "If they had the same concerns from their constituents that I have, they'll [shut down SMO].

"I used to live under the flight pattern north of Rose [Ave.] for five years, and I couldn't understand why it didn't fly over [Santa Monica]."

[Editor's note: According to the latest census data, Santa Monica's population was 89,736 as of 2010.]

In a previous motion, Rosendahl said, "We can't sit and wait anymore for the FAA to make this change. We need to start lobbying Washington, D.C., for a permanent solution to the suffocating jet emissions from Santa Monica Airport.”

"The FAA doesn't call the shots," he added to Santa Monica Patch on Wednesday night. "They're told what to do by the policymakers in Washington, and the Senate and House, and the president."

In late January, a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., sided with the FAA, rejecting Santa Monica's years-long effort to ban the fastest, largest (category C and D) jets from SMO. The Santa Monica City Council unanimously passed the C and D ban in March 2008, but the FAA immediately got an injunction against the ban, and the fast jets have continued using SMO without interruption.

On Wednesday night, pilots, controllers and mechanics are convening at SMO for a dinner and meeting with Craig Fuller, president of the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association. SMO-related issues will be discussed at the private affair, which is being hosted by the Friends of Santa Monica Airport.

Meanwhile, in recognition of Earth Day on Friday, protesters will try to increase awareness about the dangers of leaded gasoline being used by propeller planes at SMO. The action, sponsored by the Venice Neighborhood Council's Santa Monica Airport Committee, will take place at Bundy Dr. and Airport Ave., at the east end of the airport.

This article was updated at 6:22 p.m.

Laura Silagi April 21, 2011 at 03:48 AM
The anti-lead rally against prop plane fuels, especially the prop planes that fly in and out of Santa Monica Airport will be held from 3-5p.m. at the intersection of Bundy Drive and Airport Ave at the east end of Santa Monica Airport. The planes flown by flight school students account for 40% of the flights at Santa Monica Airport. These planes fly over Venice and Mar Vista all day and into the evening and aside from causing great noise pollution, also are powered by leaded fuel. Join us in protest.
Dr D A Hanson April 21, 2011 at 04:24 AM
I am relieved to see a move toward shutting down the Santa Monica Airport before there is a major catastrophe of a plane crashing into homes. Planes fly too low over homes, so close to the ground that I can see persons in the cockpit. The exhaust fumes are also extremely detrimental to everyone's health. So good riddance.
Martin Rubin April 21, 2011 at 05:55 AM
Regarding: Ultrafine-particle emissions are nearly three to 10 times higher than normal within 2,000 feet of SMO, according to a UCLA study released in November 2009. These must be the average measurements; the peak measurements are very much more alarming. Ultra-fines peak at 1,000 times normal - black carbon peaks of 250 times normal. These measurements are reflective of the very strong odor of jet fuel exhaust, both raw and burned. The peaks correlated with jet blast and jet idle and were measured in the near downwind neighborhood of North Westdale just north of Mar Vista.
badnewscoming April 21, 2011 at 05:16 PM
I recycle. I'm concerned for our environment. I marked the anniversary of the gulf coast oil spill by donating to a gulf coast charity(audubon.org, did you?), but I live and work here in Santa Monica, so it pains me to hear my 'neighbors' rant and rave about the noise and air pollution that KSMO produces in this, the #1 most polluted city in the U.S. Do they complain about the noise or air pollution coming from the 10 or 405 freeway? Are they interested in restricting the traffic on our surface streets that produce more pollution each and every day than KSMO has ever done in one day? If they are concerned about safety, why aren't they trying create a 'no fly' zone over the entire city of Santa Monica? (In it's 100 years, there have been 0 deaths of people on the ground hurt by a crashing plane...btw.) My fear is that one day one of these misguided 'concerned' resident will loose it and try and shoot down one of these planes! Their hatred is that real. There has been and continues to be a serious LACK OF LEADERSHIP on the Santa Monica city council and in our representative Bill Rosendahl. It's obvious the only thing they want is to fan the flames that will carry them to victory in the next election cycle. Do people realize how difficult it is to create, much less run a successful airport?
badnewscoming April 21, 2011 at 05:17 PM
I am not a pilot. I don't own a plane. I have been to the airport and patronized it's businesses. I enjoy the spirit and history found at KSMO, it's a very special place and probably the best municipal airport in the state much less the country! The fact is Santa Monica has taken grant money from the federal government used by and on the city because of the airport. If the city were serious about safety or pollution, the smart thing would be to re-negotiate with the feds and take even more money to offset the carbon footprint of the airport and use that money to make greener our city! In this environment where money is tight and even most every state is in a budget crisis, the city would choose to kill thousands of jobs and leave a gaping ghost town in it's wake? Sounds like these residents are really saying: “not in my back yard, but who cares about Torrance, Van Nuys or Compton.”. Santa Monica residents should wake up and realize this doesn't just affect us, but each surrounding city as well, they have a voice in this too. I would love to see the city get more money each and every year that KSMO is in operation to offset the carbon pollution from the Federal Government, imagine how much better we would be if we had strong leadership and bigger dollars annually to lead this city into the future with a successful municipal airport.
Non Pilot Bob April 21, 2011 at 05:42 PM
I think that it is safe to say the Flight Schools have had a good run with their business over the past 20+ years. To that point and as Laura points out, the flight schools are responsible actually for more than 55% of all take offs and landings. The time has come for them to pack up and move to an outlying airport where their business can continue to flourish and not impede on what was once a quiet peacefull neighborhood. I have nothing against any of the flight schools, just that their time at SMO has expired. Thank goodness the City Manager declined the licenses of two more potential noise and air poluting flight schools. Lets face it, the timing of the ad regarding FOSMO Ad and the dinner last night with AOPA was not a mistake. Lets all unite to take or health and peace of mind back.....
Dr D A Hanson April 21, 2011 at 05:44 PM
Happy to hear the Resolution passed and the fight will be taken to D.C.. Homes, schools, businesses and everyone's health will be better protected by the closure of the Santa Monica Airport. This is not an airport suitable for training pilots nor suitable for jets. The sooner they close it down the better for all.
Bob April 21, 2011 at 06:16 PM
"Dangerous Maneuvers?!" This demonstrates that Hahn has not even bothered to make the effort to learn what is involved in pilot training. I have limited sympathy for people who move next to the airport, and then start to complain. The airport serves a valuable purpose, and has been there for far longer than most residents. Local airports like these are a precious resource, and once they're gone, they never come back.
Bob April 21, 2011 at 06:24 PM
@Lloyd: I don't follow your logic. The flight schools are thriving, therefore it's now time to shut them down? While we're at it, let's just shut down every business in Santa Monica older than 20 years. They've had a good run, right? @ Dr. Hanson: When did you move to the neighbourhood? Was it before Santa Monica airport existed? If not, then surely you were aware that there were planes taking off nearby? Additionally, in what way is Santa Monica "unsuitable" for training pilots? Do you have experience in pilot training? I would very much like to know what your credentials are for making this rather sweeping statement.
Non Pilot Bob April 21, 2011 at 06:35 PM
Bob, As stated in the Santa Monica Municipal Airport section of Mandatory vs Recommended Procedures, and I quote "Santa Monica Airport is UNIQUE from the THOUSANDS of general aviation airports across the country" I thoroughly realize that aviation has it's place in society, and for that matter so do flight schools. My feeling is that when the schools started, no one knew that the city would permit them to virtually get out of control to the point on many days a plane takes off every 2.5 minutes. They have rights, I agree just let those rights be in a place less populated You are well aware of the photo showing SMO from the air, it is an aircraft carries in a sea of homes. For the record, I have been here for 34 years and I knew the airport was there, but only with 25-30 take off per day not one every 5-6 minutes. Frankly, I hear this all too often and is really a lame statement. MAy I ask what part of town you live in Bob, I bet it is not near the airport.....
Bob April 21, 2011 at 06:58 PM
Lloyd, thankyou for replying. Let me complete the sentence that you quoted: "Santa Monica Airport is unique from the thousands of general aviation airports across the country in that we have one of the strictest local airport noise ordinances." Residents may not realize that KSMO goes out of its way to mitigate the effects of noise on neighbouring communities - including strict curfews, and departure routes. The "sea of homes" that you mention is a recent development. The airport has been there for far longer than the homes. Your suggestion that flight school operations be moved to a "less populated" area is unworkable. There are simply no "less populated" areas in the LA basin. I suspect that what you really mean is "just move it somewhere not in my backyard". Just another interesting data point: Santa Monica has an average of 452 flight operations per day. Torrance has 474. Van Nuys has 1381. For the record, I live within four blocks of LAX. I knew when moving to LAX that the airport was part of the deal, so I don't complain about it.
Non Pilot Bob April 21, 2011 at 07:02 PM
Bob - Have A Nice Day :)
Bob April 21, 2011 at 07:03 PM
And you :)


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »