Lawmaker Wants Post Office Closure Suspended

Los Angeles Congressman Henry Waxman says the Postal Service didn't give the community enough time to appeal the closure of the Fifth Street post office. The agency says it followed federal regulations.

Weeks after the United States Postal Service's deadline passed for the public to comment on the unpopular sale of Santa Monica's Main Post Office, U.S. Rep. Henry Waxman fired off a letter Thursday that accuses the agency of violating federal regulations.

In his letter (copied in its entirety below this article), the Los Angeles Congressman contended USPS didn't give the public enough time to appeal the sale and didn't give enough detail when it justified relocating the retail services to an annex facility near the Big Blue Bus yard.

He also demanded the Postal Regulatory Commission "ensure that USPS follow appropriate procedure and suspend its efforts to close the post office until completion of the appeals process."

Waxman said he believes the public should have been given 30 days—not 15—to appeal the decision. Additionally, he wrote, "the USPS did not consider the effect of closing the 5th Street Post Office on the community it serves."

Santa Monica Churns Out Post Office Closure Appeals

Thirty days is required only when a post office is closed. The sale of the Santa Monica post office on Fifth Street is classified as a "relocation," because the services are being moved, not discontinued, said USPS spokesman Richard Maher. 

"There are currently three USPS retail locations in Santa Monica and there will be three providing all the same services after the relocation takes place," spokesman Richard Maher wrote in an email. "The building may be closed and sold, but the same services will still be available at the Carrier Annex building."

Though he didn't state it in his letter, Waxman believes the relocation should actually be classified as a closure, his office said.

Here's what the federal statute says about the appeal period for relocations:

At any public meeting or hearing, advise local officials and the community of their appeal rights and the process by which an appeal can be made. Information provided must include time limitations and an address for the appeal.

In a footnote, Waxman makes the case for the relocation to be classified as a closure or discontinuance:

USPS’s decision to terminate all postal operations there, however, and its stated intention to sell the historic building constitutes a discontinuance, which is defined in Handbook PO-101 as “an action in which an independent Post Office, Classified Station, or Classified Branch is permanently closed or consolidated."

Here's what the federal code says about appealing closures:

Within the first 30 days after the written determination is made available, any person regularly served by a Post Office subject to discontinuance may appeal the decision to the Postal Regulatory Commission.

The USPS did provide the appeal information at a public meeting on July 20, and again in a news release to media announcing the final decision to sale the property.

During that meeting, USPS representatives said the relocation would save the Postal Service $3.36 million over 10 years. Postal Service properties are being sold across the country to generate cash as the agency wrangles with a multi-billion shortfall.

Is Post Office Closure a Done Deal?

— Waxman's letter —

Shoshana Grove

Secretary of the Commission

Postal Regulatory Commission

901 New York Avenue, NW Suite 200

Washington, DC 20268-0001


Dear Secretary Grove,

As the Representative of California’s 30th Congressional District, which includes the City of Santa Monica, I am writing to appeal the United States Postal Service’s (USPS) decision to approve the closure of the Santa Monica Post Office located at 1248 5th Street and to consolidate its operations at the Santa Monica Carrier Annex located at 1653 7th Street.

The 5th Street Post Office is a classified station of the Santa Monica postal installation.  In its August 17, 2012 Notice of Approval, USPS described the closure of the 5th Street Post Office as a relocation.  USPS’s decision to terminate all postal operations there, however, and its stated intention to sell the historic building constitutes a discontinuance, which is defined in Handbook PO-101 as “an action in which an independent Post Office, Classified Station, or Classified Branch is permanently closed or consolidated.”[1] 

In its decision to close the 5th Street Post Office, USPS failed in a number of instances to comply with 39 CFR 241.3, which establishes the rules governing USPS’s decisions on post office closures.:  

1. Notice -- USPS failed to provide the community with a 60-day notice of the    proposed closure.  Also, in its Notice of Approval, USPS failed to inform the public of the right to appeal a closure to the Postal Regulatory Commission within 30 days of the date the Final Determination was posted.  

2. Effect on Community -- USPS did not consider the effect of closing the 5th Street Post Office on the community it serves, nor has it communicated the benefits of the Carrier Annex to the community. The 5th Street Post Office, which is located in the heart of Santa Monica, is easily accessible to thousands of residents who walk or depend on public transit. Many seniors and residents with disabilities depend on the easily accessible facility, which has plenty of parking and is well served by multiple local and regional bus lines.

In contrast, the 7th Street Carrier Annex is in a remote location that raises serious questions about access and safety. The Carrier Annex is surrounded on three sides by the 10 Freeway and a one way off-ramp to the south, the Big Blue Bus Maintenance Facility and Bus yard to the west, and a 5-lane stretch of Pacific Coast Highway to the north. On the northwest side, a planned light rail line will run down the middle of Colorado Avenue and terminate at a still unfinished site on 5th and Colorado. Pedestrians currently served by the 5th Street Post Office would have to cross these light rail tracks to get to the Carrier Annex.  The attached pictures illustrate the stark contrast between the two locations.

3. Economic Savings -- The Notice of Approval does not give a specific reason for the closure beyond stating that “the reason behind this cost-reduction and revenue generation plan is the alignment of USPS workforce and infrastructure with a 20 percent drop in total mail volume over the past three years due to a diversion to electronic communications and business transactions, and other economic factors.”[2]   USPS has not provided the community with information about estimated economic savings of the proposed action. It appears, however, that the consolidation of the 5th Street Post Office at the remotely located Carrier Annex could result in a decline in revenue. 

Finally, the 5th Street Post Office is a historic landmark that has been serving the residents of Santa Monica since its dedication in 1938. It is the policy of USPS that any facility project that will have an effect on cultural resources will be undertaken in accordance with Section 106 of the general provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 470, et seq., Executive Order 12072 and Executive Order 13006. The Postal Service has failed to demonstrate how it intends to comply with this policy.

I urge the Postal Regulatory Commission to ensure that USPS follows the process required to make a decision on the closure of the 5th Street Post Office. I also ask that you suspend any effort to close the 5th Street Post Office pending the outcome of the process for appeals.

Dan Charney September 21, 2012 at 05:31 AM
Yes- so proud of our Representative Mr. Waxman. The city is being railroaded by a few in charge and the developers. It must stop. Thank you Mr. Waxman.
j pena September 21, 2012 at 09:37 PM
That's great that Waxman is working on this. I agree 100% that the community wasn't consulted sufficiently. I was in there last week it was very full (making money!) and no one on line had heard about a possible closure. Nobody out of ten people. It upsets people very much when they hear about this and no one wants to go to 7th St. very inconvenient! Please keep the pressure on.
jo September 22, 2012 at 10:47 AM
I applaude you Waxman, but where have you been? This type of thing is happening all over the country & seems to be ignored until it is seriously 'too late' to change.
JohnCySmith.com September 22, 2012 at 11:47 PM
Thanks to Congressman Waxman for not giving up the fight. Now it's time for the rest of us to get busy. I will be sending letters to Senators Feinstein and Boxer, urging them to make a similar appeal and hope Santa Monica residents do the same. Smart businesses don't close popular and profitable locations in the heart of a city. Congressman Waxman is right. This is indeed a "closure", not a "relocation" and the public was not given enough notice, nor enough time to appeal. What's more, the Postal Service will never realize the $3 million dollar "savings" it envisions, because few people, including myself, will ever use the new facility. No wonder the Postal Service is billions in the red. Let's show them how powerful our pens can be. I'm not giving up yet. Santa Monica shouldn't either. John C. Smith, Santa Monica City Council Candidate "Common Name, Common Sense, for ALL of Santa Monica"


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »