Politics & Government

LETTER: Miramar Hotel Project Raises Concerns

Laura Marcus says in a letter to the editor that Santa Monica does not need more gridlock-causing traffic and pollution.

Dear Editor,

I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Miramar Project.

I think the scope of this project is detrimental to the neighborhood on every level, but since the environment impact is being addressed currently, I will start with that.

I am highly concerned about the traffic and noise pollution the Miramar will bring to the community. Unlike further south, where there is a great deal of development and commercialization, this part of Santa Monica is part of a residential neighborhood, which still values its relative quiet, unobstructed access to the bike path and ocean views without the overwhelming shadow of a monstrous development in its midst. Santa Monica currently enjoys some of the best air quality in the city, with the ability to walk and bike everywhere. 

There is enough gridlock-causing traffic and pollution around the downtown business district and Santa Monica Place. We have ample retail and restaurant space in the city--for both residents and tourists to be able to enjoy. We don't need more. In fact, how about redeveloping the business area along Wilshire Blvd? There are many under used buildings which can be refurbished and upgraded without adding an addition complex which will drain and detract from the natural resources we have in the city.

We don't need the traffic, the fumes, the garbage, the sewage and the additional strain on the power grid. I am also concerned about the greenhouse effect. This proposed development's proximity to the ocean, in which we surf and swim, is of particular concern. Santa Monica, a once sleepy beach community, is being overrun with over-development. Someone needs to say "uncle" before we turn this city into Miami Beach or worse, New York By-the-Sea.  Money isn't everything. Quality of life and health should count for something, even in this day and age.

I attended the meeting at the Public Library last Thursday, May 16th and I have to say that I was quite disappointed to see that the public was not allowed a forum to air their concerns publicly.  The breakout areas really didn't provide a proper forum for group discussion and created the impression that the city council had already determined what was best for the community without regard for the community's opinion. Going forward, if in fact, the City Council hasn't already rubbed-stamped this project through to completion, you may want to consider this. Needless to say, if it is rubber-stamped through, the City Council can forget about getting my vote in the next election--and I have the access and the knowledge to take my fight to the media.

Needless to say, if it is rubber-stamped through, the City Council can forget about getting my vote in the next election.

Sincerely,
Laura Marcus


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here