Council Green-lights Miramar Development Talks

There's still concerns about the mass of the new hotel. City staffers say they'll look at alternatives for a smaller project during an environmental review.

Negotiations will begin between the city and the owners of the who are seeking to tear down, rebuild and double the size of the hotel at the corner of Wilshire Boulevard and Ocean Avenue.

With assurances from city planning staffers that alternatives for a smaller project than what's currently proposed—550,000 square-foot hotel with as many as 120 condos and shops and restaurants—will be fully vetted during an environmental review, the City Council voted 6-1 to proceed with the development talks.

The city will ask owners MSD Capital L.P. to make a number of concessions in exchange for building above and beyond Santa Monica zoning codes' height and density maximums.

As suggested by the council Tuesday night, some of the concessions could include the hotel providing a training program for its employees, hiring local workers and paying them above minimum wage, providing bicycle parking and incorporating public art in outdoor spaces.

The plans presented to the City Council Tuesday night were tweaked a bit since the Planning Commission criticized them in February for being too dense and the architecture too generic.

The biggest changes include increasing the number of hotel rooms from 265 to 280 and to growing the square footage of meeting space from 11,500 to 14,100 and retail space from 6,400 to 9,300 while shrinking the square footage allotted for condominiums from 253,000 to 239,000. The changes are expected to result in less traffic—a major concern for neighbors.


"They attempted to be responsive to the Planning Commission," said Councilwoman Gleam Davis.

"It's important that we really do vet alternatives," she continued. This is a prominent spot that deserves a stupendous project."

Despite the revisions, the plans continued to incite pushback from most of the council, which still considers the project to be too dense.

MSD Capital has come up with four alternative plans for the project that vary based on the height and placement of buildings and the location of entryways and driveways. None of the alternatives call for a reduction of square footage.

It also agreed to modify to its plans along Second Street, including eliminating a dedicated driveway entrance for condo residents, extending the retail space further along Second Street and building a new pedestrian entryway.

The City Council was pleased to hear that the owners are also agreeing to move forward with suggestions from planning staff that it divide a park at the corner of Wilshire and Ocean into two zones, the first would be open 24/7 to the public and the second would be open to the public when it's not being used for hotel functions.

The new design shows a 25-foot wide, "always open," 10,000-square foot park along the east side of Ocean Avenue (with Palisades Park across the street). At a separate grade would be the "conditionally open" space in front of the hotel ballroom and Moreton Bay fig tree, and a prominent piece of public art at the corner of Wilshire and Ocean.

About 50 people spoke to the City Council Tuesday night in favor of and in opposition to the project.

Many locals have said the project would be way too big for Santa Monica. Merchants, the Chamber of Commerce and Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. said it would generate much needed revenue for the city. The consensus has been that a redo is necessary, but not every one is sold on the plans.


"The people wearing the stop signs [stickers] tended to say they wanted the hotel revitalized... and the friends [of the project] wearing the blue stickers said they're not fond of the whole enchilada," said Councilman Kevin McKeown.

McKeown cast the dissenting vote. He wanted the council to require MSD Capital to come up with a plan to reduce the project’s massing by 25 percent before the city even initiated the environmental review.

The Miramar Hotel is owned by an affiliate of MSD Capital L.P., an investment firm with offices in Santa Monica, New York and London. It purchased the hotel in 2006 for $204 million and has made about $10 million in updates since.

The proposed expansion is expected to cost $255 million, with the owners projecting to make about $40 million in the first 10 years after construction is complete.

The soonest doors would open to a renovated Miramar would be 2018.

Stay up to date on Santa Monica news and events by following @StaMonicaPatch and “liking” us on Facebook.

J Edward Tipre April 25, 2012 at 07:11 PM
Bravo council member Kevin McKeown who cast the dissenting vote on the current Miramar plan while requiring MSD Capital to come up with a plan to "reduce the project’s massing by 25 percent before the city initiates the environmental review." (Unhappily, now a fait accompli). One shudders to think of Ocean Avenue becoming a postage stamp version of Miami Beach for lack of appropriate courage and foresight by the council. We're all for the pro union aspects of MSD and its promises for scores of working people, but believe long-term aesthetic history affecting thousands and millions over future years needs be recognized and supported. A tag regarding traffic burdens: Believe that California incline at Ocean Avenue could become hellish (Think smaller version of Colorado Avenue after 4 pm each day). Hopeful that thorough discussion of traffic mitigation occurs.
Captain Liberty October 23, 2012 at 08:19 PM
Is Kevin McKeown the only one on the city council not owned by the developers? Is no one on the council aware of the traffic problem the city has already and what hundreds of additional condos at that location will mean for the rest of us? Is gridlock the new form of 'traffic calming' -- because if it is members of the council should know that the traffic may be calm but the drivers are furious at them. Given the recent study that eliminating the parking garage on 4th Street to install a mega movie theater will further add to our gridlock, it appears the council is looking to turn Santa Monica into New York or New Delhi. And what do you think this will do for property values? That's a rhetorical question. The answer is it will undermine them.
J Edward Tipre October 23, 2012 at 09:42 PM
Kevin McKeown can't do it all. He needs collegial support. Solution: Scale down the project and support union labor. Both are possible; otherwise, increasing traffic burdens and shadowy streets await.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »