.
Feedback

Smoking Banned in New Hotels, Not New Residences

The Santa Monica City Council will revisit possible prohibitions to smoking in residential units in as few as 90 days.

Santa Monica is snuffing out smoking in new hotels.

Tenants of apartment complexes, condominiums and other multi-unit residences, however, can continue puffing.

The City Council on Tuesday, responding to “mounting public health concerns” related to secondhand smoke that wafts through shared ventilation systems, voted 5-1 to place the restrictions on hotels. A majority, however, said they weren’t ready to do the same to people's homes.

"If we're going to do this, I want to do it right," said Councilwoman Gleam Davis.

Before the council was a proposal to prohibit smoking in newly constructed and newly vacated residential units. It would have also required that all existing residential units in multi-unit properties be designated as either smoking or nonsmoking and that landlords and homeowners associations maintain rosters of all units’ smoking status. The rosters would then be distributed to current and prospective occupants.

Landlords objected, saying that would violate their tenants' privacy; residents said they felt discriminated against; and even a few council members said there were holes in the proposal, such as how the ban would apply to smokers of medicinal marijuana and how it would jibe with

The council will reconsider a revamped proposal in as few as 90 days. The ban on hotels will require a final vote, likely to take place at a meeting in January.

“The prudent thing for us to do is pause,” said Councilman Kevin McKeown.

Two council members advocated for the immediate passage.

“People are smoking, putting the smoke into the ventilation systems, and it's pumped right into that little child's house,” said Councilman Bobby Shriver. "It’s a sad day ... that the council has failed to pass this."

But McKeown said the proposed prohibition overreached and that the city had moved “to somehow trying to make all of Santa Monica a smoke-free zone.”

The city has incrementally placed prohibitions on smoking. In June 2010, the council banned smoking in common areas and patios of multi-unit residences. Four years earlier, it placed a ban on the and outdoor dining areas. At that time, lighting up on the beach was already prohibited.

Councilman Robert Holbrook, a pharmacist, joined Shriver in wanting the ban passed Tuesday night. Those who want to smoke will adapt; they will take a walk outside, smoke inside their cars or find some other place to do it, he said.

"Smoke is pervasive; it will creep under door jambs and everywhere else," he said. "It's tough. It's really hard on people who don't smoke and who are trying to remain healthy."

The decision to delay the vote was prompted by Sarah Letts, executive director of Community Corp. of Santa Monica, a nonprofit that develops and manages affordable housing in the Los Angeles area.

She asked for more time to research how landlords would implement the ban.

"It raises a lot of questions and concerns," she said, including those of personal privacy. Landlords would be required to deliver to each unit a final designation list that would essentially “call out tenants who are engaging in a private activity."

The council also heard from tenants whose asthmatic children were sickened by smoke coming from neighbors' homes. They also heard from representatives of the American Lung Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics; Dr. Michael Ong, chair of the state's Tobacco Education and Research Oversight Committee; and several local pediatricians.

"I have had many pediatric patients whose asthma and other conditions were worsened by secondhand smoke," said Cambria Garell, a third-year resident in UCLA's pediatric program and a volunteer at a local clinic on Pico Boulevard.

Garrell said she's written pleas on behalf of her patients—many of whom cannot afford to relocate—to landlords, asking them to move them into a unit away from smokers.

A new state law set to take effect in January would allow landlords to designate a rental unit or an entire apartment complex as "nonsmoking."

While many apartment complexes already have smoke-free policies, until now there was nothing in state law that explicitly permitted a landlord to restrict smoking.

The law requires landlords to place smoking restrictions in rental agreements. Tenants violating the terms of the rental agreement would be at risk of eviction, unless they are tenants of a rent-controlled complex.

City Councilman Terry O'Day was absent from Tuesday's meeting.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Santa Monica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
j pena May 25, 2013 at 05:03 pm
Beautifully stated Apolinaire. Imagine how proud we could be of this city if some care was taken toRead More promote artists and musicians here. There are so many! Yet there are no real opportunities to come together as a community because we lack a space for that. Spaces created by developers are inevitably about making money, or overpriced like the Broad Auditorium. I haven't been once there because of price and because their programming doesn't appeal. It's for an elite and not for residents.
Apolinaire May 25, 2013 at 11:38 am
I totally agree with the above comments. The thing that gets me is that there are no fundsRead More "available" to keep the doors of the landmark Civic Auditorium open, a place that our wonderful Santa Monica Symphony has called "home" for so many years. What a way to go! We don't need "mixed-use" buildings, but we need a place where the human creative genius can unfold and protects our cultural heritage.
j pena May 23, 2013 at 09:19 am
The City Council and Planning Commission have given our city away to billionaire developers andRead More business. Developers should be footing the bills. They need to stop rolling over to the likes of Dell, owner of the Miramar, who ripped off the city for several million dollars already. Instead they are considering letting him build 150 5 million $ luxury condos at the Miramar. In a residential neighborhood, a 22 story eyesore at our city gate.
Eddie Greenberg May 8, 2013 at 09:09 pm
Thank you Marilyn Wexler. I totally agree with all that you have said in this eloquent letter. SMPDRead More have done well in DUI checkpoints for the past few years and they are appreciated for doing so. We are all better off for their efforts!
Aaron Mirsky April 11, 2013 at 06:26 pm
Great letter! Mr. Hill, you have a wonderful perspective and attitude. I am relatively new hear, myRead More family moved to Santa Monica in 1976. I cherish my memories at Santa Monica Beach and hope to continue to "refresh my soul" for many years to come.
Steven Rosen April 10, 2013 at 01:43 pm
Beautiful letter and I under his perspective. But I think if you look at the Quality of Life from aRead More generic standpoint (if there is such a thing), I don't think we headed in an upward trajectory. I cannot imagine more traffic, and new skyline created by tall buildings and newly-required traffic management to make the Quality of Life better for any of us.
Stodj April 9, 2013 at 04:41 pm
Lovely comment. I sense from your letter a new perspective on why this growth is happening, besidesRead More the $ involved, everyone needs to refresh their souls in this time of history and Santa Monica does that...at least at the beach where, hopefully, building will not progress. We do need to focus on halting the height of buildings as that will seriously change the environment here. Thanks, Michael.
karen April 11, 2013 at 11:02 pm
I left Santa Monica in 1987. I went to Samohi and Lincoln, worked at Sears and loved the small townRead More feel. Yes it's changed, but so has everywhere else. If my kids were young enough to drag along I would move there in a heartbeat. If you don't like it anymore, don't visit. I don't really understand why anyone would write to a local media outlet and complain about the town. How insulting. I'll take SM over the Bay area (talk about expensive!) any day.
SantaMonicaNative April 8, 2013 at 07:02 pm
Continued (sorry) The city changes. More people, more housing needed. More people more cars, moreRead More traffic, more trash, more dogs. Next we get the commercial builders who see Santa Monica as a cashbox. In city where 10 stories is tall, we get money hungery people who don't live here, who think 20 stories is better. That's where we are now. A turning point in the city. Once you build them you can't take them back. The city will change even more with the Expo line. We can't stop change, we can't restrict building except through zoning. We can temper it. What we can do is shop locally to save the few local businesses that remain and call City Hall on over ambitious projects. Speak up! It's frustrating-they don't listen but eventually they can be voted out. Don't let Santa Monica turn into Beverly Hills by the sea. We need normal businesses we can afford. Places to eat that you don't need a loan. Stop voting for group politics, read the ballot, get involved, even if only on a personal level. Know your city, don't just complain.
SantaMonicaNative April 8, 2013 at 06:47 pm
My parents loved Santa Monica, the first place i remember was a huge old house on 4th and MontannaRead More which had been subivided into units. If my parents had kept all the properties they owned in this city, i'd be rich. That said i must admit i still love Santa Monica. Go back to any city you grew up in and you will be shocked by the change. Part of the change has to do with the congested state if Caliornia. There are more people, no doubt of that. The other thing is memory tends to blur the facts. The things that matter to an adult are meaningless to a child. There are so many things that have disppeared from this city but they have been replaced by other things. Nothing but bugs are ixed in amber,cities can't be. In addition to that, Santa Monica has not grown in a natural fashion. The City Council has intervened in the natural growth of the city with laws, taxes and programs to fashion a city THEY want, not necessarily what would have been. The city has been pushed into a schitzophrenic combination of high ideals and directed outcomes. Rent control remade the city, changing it from a city with children and families to single renters. Vacancy decontrol helped to change that. Mom and pop owners are almost gone. Few small businesses can exist here, they can't compete with chains The city favors tenants over landlords, lawyers are expensive so properties get sold, torn down and replaced by multiple units. Low income housing increases the density of neighborhoods.
Steve Herbert April 10, 2013 at 08:12 pm
Many folks say the biking is not for them, therefore it can't work for everyone. What should theyRead More should say is it may not work for them but if a larger percentage of those who can ride would, the total numberof drivers would be reduced as more of them are out of their cars and riding bikes. Also consider if you can afford to drive a car you very likely can afford an electric bike. These "hybrids" are a nice blend of an electric motor with a bicycle which can provide as much or as little assistance as the rider prefers. As they still qualify as bikes so you can use and benefit from the bike lanes, but as they are electric they can help those with arthritis, sciatica and other people make the impossible, possible.
RJ April 9, 2013 at 06:18 pm
...ditto Paul!
RJ April 9, 2013 at 06:17 pm
.....Barbara, you forgot to add the need to eliminate about half of the population in Santa MonicaRead More before one could "rediscover" the sleepy beach town it used to be. Then don't forget the other "bike riders" that drive just a crazy as some automobile drivers....failing to abide by the rules of the road...and law! Unfortunately city officials have been trying to squeeze 10 pounds of garbage into 5 pound bags for the last 20 years....then come up with bright ideas like proposing to build movie theaters that enter/empty right on to 4th Street at Arizona (after tearing down the City parking garage) were we all know every idiot that has been issued a driver's license will stop and hold up traffic to drop off their kids...only to return to do it all over again when picking them up. Heaven forbid their kids have to walk from a block away where the parent could avoid blocking traffic on one of the busiest main thoroughfare streets in the city. I’m sure you could come up with many more examples of the most insane development that has happened or is proposed to happen. So Barbara......where is that area with "no congestion"???
Jonathan Friedman April 10, 2013 at 04:08 am
Good luck Jessica. Watch out for Jerry.
Paul S April 10, 2013 at 01:47 am
Don't correct it Jerry - it's very you and we all knew what you meant- and it was fine
Jerry Rubin April 10, 2013 at 01:16 am
CORRECTING my previous comment: Welcome Jessica!
Chris Loos April 4, 2013 at 04:00 pm
When the Expo line is complete and people start using it to travel back and forth from Santa MonicaRead More to DTLA, I think the idea of going without a car (or getting by with 1 car per household instead of 2) will seem mainstream to many more people.
Michael April 4, 2013 at 03:33 pm
3) Getting folks to part with their cars is like forcing divorce upon a couple rapturously in loveRead More 40 minute commute from Santa Monica to Downtown LA on the Expo Line!! Where do I sign up? I will be one of the first to move to a residence within walking distance of a Santa Monica Expo Station. If not having a parking space makes my rent cheaper I have no problem selling my car.
Chris Loos April 4, 2013 at 01:43 pm
Great article Juan!
Glenn E Grab March 30, 2013 at 02:12 pm
last week it took me 1 hour and 15 minutes to go from Sepulveda and Culver to the Lemlee Theatre onRead More 2nd street at 3:30 on Sunday afternoon...I can ride my bike there in 30 minutes...the only reason I took my car was because I went with two friends...one of whom was temporarily on crutches..we griped at him the whole evening..
mimi March 29, 2013 at 02:22 am
There is another travel option for the disabled called Access Services. They transport all over losRead More angeles and neighboring suburbs. You may want to check them out. You are fortunate to have a friend who transports you around instead of riding with WISE, which you dislike.. You could be of great help to your friend if you used Google Directions (before you leave home) to find various routes to your destination. I am familiar with the Chez Jay location on Ocean Ave. There are better and worse ways to get there. I suggest you choose better. Of course, this requires advance planning and a bit of home work. Think of all the aggravation you will save yourself and your friend. The choice is yours.
Dan Charney March 29, 2013 at 02:21 am
Well said- I never go downtown - haven't for almost ten or more years- once every few years I go toRead More the Genius Bar- take the bus-( which no longer runs on my street)- I have been going to Chez Jay almost 40 years or more- I used to work out on the bluffs- can't do any shopping anywhere near Wilshire or Montana- I can walk to Main - get my groceries at night- what is happening here is no different than what is happening in Congress and to our entire country- the rich are doing as they wish - the rest of us can die- the building that will be gone soon will be any with low income tenants and shabby houses- all gone