.

That Sound You Hear Is the [Expo] Train Coming to Santa Monica

Residents see the final design of the Santa Monica-Culver City section of the Expo Line, while the companion bike route design is about 30 percent finished.

It used to exist only on a map. But for awhile now, Santa Monica and West L.A. residents along the Expo light rail line have been able to see—and hear—the route being prepared. Sometimes they even feel it or taste it.

Residents were reminded at an Expo update meeting on Wednesday that they face another two-years-plus of noise, dust and traffic delays before the first test train rolls between Santa Monica and Culver City. Regular service begins in 2016. Service on Expo’s Phase 1 between downtown L.A. and Culver City began earlier this year.

Using maps, schematics and artists’ renderings, Expo officials presented an update on the line’s final design and current construction.

Meanwhile, the California Supreme Court is reviewing a lawsuit and a motion for an immediate halt to construction by a group of Westwood and Cheviot Hills residents. Neighbors For Smart Rail contends Expo’s environmental review did not adequately assess the line’s impact on their neighborhoods. A specific concern is when the train route is on a street.

That will also be the situation near its western end, on Colorado Avenue in Santa Monica.

Councilman Kevin McKeown, at the Expo meeting, said the city wanted it that way and not on an elevated platform, to avoid "a huge urban infrastructure in the middle of our city… that would be visible and audible for blocks around."

Near the Expo terminus at Colorado and Fourth Street in Santa Monica, McKeown said, the trains will be much like buses, obeying stoplights.

"There will be changes in traffic flow but we think they’ll be manageable," McKeown said.

While Phase 2’s route and station designs are set, Expo pegs the design of the companion bike route at about 30 percent complete. That route will open simultaneously with the rail service, as was done with the rail and bike routes in Phase 1.

Some avid cyclists, however, have been slow to applaud Phase 2's bike route. Santa Monica rider Eric Weinstein said he feels Expo’s Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC) has been marginalized, leaving the bike route with many trouble spots. He’s particularly concerned about the safety of young people who don’t ride their bikes every day.

"For $1.5 billion dollars they could do a lot better," Weinstein said of the estimated cost of the entire Phase 2 project. "We’re not seizing the moment to get a bikeway that’s separated from traffic. Instead, we’re getting the cheapest possible thing."

Expo’s Gabriela Collins says the agency has been "working more closely" with the BAC in recent months, "addressing the more challenging areas."

A prime example is the Pico/Gateway intersection, where riders encounter "traffic coming in all sorts of directions," Collins said. Revisions have been made to the bike route there in consultation with the City of Los Angeles' Department of Transportation and a review by the BAC.

South Brentwood rider David Holtzman said the bike route will give cyclists more options to go east across the 405 freeway.

"This train line follows a fairly level route; bike riders will gravitate to a flatter route," he said.

 

Dan Charney October 29, 2012 at 07:40 PM
I am dreading this- why not take these people to Manhattan Beach? or anywhere but here? Enough people - hopefully I will be gone before this happens- sick to heart at what my town has become - techies to the right of me - developers to the left- here I am stuck in the middle of pretentious BS
Rebecca A. Anderson October 30, 2012 at 12:38 AM
Peace, peace, please let there be peace. Why does everything seem to need to be torn up all of the time. Will they ever finish these projects? Are we really getting somewhere? And, Oh my God, where on earth does all the money for these projects Really come from?
LAofAnaheim October 30, 2012 at 03:17 AM
Measure R is funding this extension of the Expo Line Phase II. Measure R, the half cent sales tax increase passed in 2008 by a super majority of Angelenos, funds this extension of the Expo Line. And yes, all of these projects finish. Which project are you referring to that never finished?
Brenda Barnes October 30, 2012 at 07:21 AM
The Century Freeway took almost that long to finish and displaced thousands of poor people. The 405 is never finished. The subway lines have been being built for something like 30 years now. What do you mean, they do get finished? After we're all dead? From the noise, pollution, and expense? The cost is ridiculous, and the money comes from us and is wasted. People planning this are clearly amateurs. "We think it will be manageable." Great. Like there never has been a rail line before? Just for about 100 years in London. Why don't they get experts instead of all these local wannabes who just worship rail? Because it's the corrupt local government in charge, that's why. When Pam O'Connor heads a committee, you know we're in deep trouble.
Gary Kavanagh October 30, 2012 at 10:42 PM
Freeway projects are an entirely different beast, uprooting and destroying neighborhoods to be forced in. The rail development in LA is largely retracing it's prior steps (take a look at a 1920's rail map sometime), and as such minimizing construction impacts, building where we used to have rail until our predecessors decided it would be a good idea to abandon and destroy the rail system after betting all in on cars. Many neighborhoods of LA only came to exist because of their connection to the trolley network. The phase I of the Expo line finished, a little late on account of lawsuits and a few delaying factors, but it's there people can ride it, and they couldn't before. Phase II will finish as well, and make the first phase far more valuable and functional as the network grows. I am 28, and short of any early demise or abandonment of our present plans, I expect to see & be able to use a much broader LA rail network that will connect to a much faster state railway system. But far sooner than of our present plans being totally "done", the system builds out incrementally and will provide useful new or more efficient functionality as we go a long. For people uncomfortable with change, unfortunately we have been born into the wrong time in human history for any significant length of stasis. We overwhelmed the landscape with cars, imagining easy driving & flying forever, but cheap fuel is running down now, so we have to plan for transport that is less wasteful.
Simon October 31, 2012 at 02:55 AM
Your "sick to heart" that a public transit option is opening?? Wow, talk about whitepeopleproblems. This will benefit hundreds of thousands of people, give people commuting options, and cut down on pollution. Talk about selfish.
Simon October 31, 2012 at 02:57 AM
Bravo to Gary Kavanagh's words below. We've built nearly 90 miles of rail in 22 years; the system carries 350,000 commuters every day. It's easy to scream 'corruption' and 'waste' when you don't look at the facts.
Dan Charney October 31, 2012 at 03:29 AM
Personally - I am all for mass transit and providing a smarter alternative to cars and freeways- I am simply sorry that it's bringing "hundred of thousands" to Santa Monica- I wish it would take them somewhere else- I miss the town I moved to before it was wall to wall hotels , condos, business parks and techies- yes- I miss the sleepiness of it - I wish they would go to Redondo Beach and take all the development and people with them- if that makes me selfish- so bet it-
Ken Yaros November 01, 2012 at 09:03 PM
There's good and bad about this project, and then there's necessity. Bottom line is we need more mass transit. Ideally it would be underground but it's not.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »