Judge Allows Limited Field Lighting for Football Games

The Malibu High School football team will be allowed to play its Oct. 26 homecoming game under lights.

A judge ruled Friday that the Malibu High School football team will be able to play its Oct. 26 homecoming game at night, under the school's new field lights.

Under a temporary restraining order issued Friday by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge James Chalfant, the lights can be installed and turned on for football games, including the homecoming game versus Fillmore High School, but not for any other sports or events at this time, according to Malibu City Attorney Christi Hogin.

Hogin said the lights will be allowed for games until Nov. 8, when Chalfant will hold the first hearing pertaining to a lawsuit that seeks to block permanent lighting from being used for night games.

"It is the opportunity for the [school] district and the city to respond to the plaintiff's request to prevent poles installed and light use during [the] lawsuit," Hogin said. "... Although obviously the court's decision to allow the poles to go up now suggests that plaintiffs may not have been able to prove their complaints outweigh the value of the limited use of lights the city approved in the coastal development permit, which is the subject of the lawsuit."

The lawsuit, filed in July by the Malibu Community Preservation Alliance and the Malibu Township Council, claims the lights will alter the rural characteristics of Western Malibu. Parents and community members have said the lights are needed to improve the athletic experience at the school and to provide a place for families to watch games after the end of the workday.  

In June, the Malibu City Council granted a coastal development permit and a conditional use permit for the installation of the 70-foot-high lights, limiting their use to a maximum of 61 nights a year.

“It is very exciting that our homecoming celebration will be under lights,” said Seth Jacobson, a member of the steering committee for the “Bring on the Lights” campaign.

“The hundreds of parents and businesses that contributed to the lights campaign are very excited that the lights will finally be a reality," Jacobson said. "We also take the plaintiffs at their word that they will be back in court on Nov. 8, and between now and then we stand ready to find a permanent resolution to this issue that is in the best interests of the Malibu community."

Councilwoman Laura Zahn Rosenthal, who said she was speaking for herself and not on behalf of the city, said she is excited for the Malibu community that has worked so hard for the kids.

"This has been a long journey and the school community has won at every turn," Rosenthal said. "The school groups were willing to compromise and did so many times. The lights will go up and I have every expectation that they will stay up for the soccer and lacrosse seasons. I hope that everyone - no matter what side of the issue you may be on - will join us in a wonderful community celebration on Oct. 26." 

Cami Winikoff, a Malibu Park resident who is among the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, confirmed the terms of the temporary restraining order and said she believes it is a win-win for all parties.

“We’ve been working all through the night to get a compromise out of court,” Winikoff said. “We wanted to figure out how to get the lights up for these games so we could continue to work [toward a compromise].”

She said the temporary restraining order begins to address neighbors’ concerns about the impact of the poles on ocean views and the lights on the neighborhood's dark skies.

“For us, the big thing is that we got the representation in court that the installed poles are removable," she said. "That is the first component of what we are trying to settle on."

Winiknoff said she believes the issuance of the temporary restraining order shows the judge "saw the merits of the case."

“We’re hopeful the community can now reach a reasonable compromise where the students get lighted athletic fields and the community gets extended periods of dark skies and no poles,” Winikoff said.

Hans Laetz October 25, 2012 at 10:41 PM
Ms. Lucoff, you and your husband "Terry" regularly emerge in these columns to trash the school, trash the "city counsel" and trash whomever you want. I support you doing that. But you should not be surprised if someone answers.
scott greco October 25, 2012 at 10:48 PM
here's some more facts... My wife and i have lived in Malibu for 12 years. We purchased our current home in april- 6 months prior to the lighting restriction being removed in october. There are 471 homes in Malibu Park- less than 5% have donated to the lights. I have seen the list, I'd be happy to share it with you. I can also share pictures of homes who's views have now been devastated with these lights. Make no mistake, home values WILL decrease. Children do not annoy my wife and I. Please read the surfside news article today for more facts from Cami. Hans, even though we disagree, I want to thank you for your kind words about me and my wife in your earlier posting. We have both supported you fully in your Trancas lighting issue and never once said you should be stuck with more light because you bought near a shopping plaza. It's hard for me to understand why you can't respect that we also want less light in our neighborhood. There are reasonable solutions for both Trancas and for Malibu Park. We ask that you support a compromise where kids have some lit games and we protect what's beautiful about our neighborhood just like you are trying to protect yours. I really think it's important that we all work together to protect what's intrinsically valuable about Malibu.
Gwen Lucoff October 25, 2012 at 10:54 PM
Sir, my name is Mrs Lucoff to you, and my husband and I might be on these list regularly to comment, but we are also both out there either picking up trash or maintaining the plants that we have donated that line the end of cloverheights, I use the school every day, and I do my best to bring to the schools attention any needed maintance, such as broken sprinklers, if not fixed are almost as tall as a yellowstone geiser, and waste lots of water, I wish all that wasted money would go to paying our teachers instead of running into the drain and down to the ocean. Like I said before, I can't wait till they take the lights down when not in use, so I don't have to look at them every daylight hour of the day.
Hans Laetz October 25, 2012 at 10:59 PM
Thank you. And I have supported MHS neighbors on their legitimate complaints about noise, trash, traffic and light pollution from the school. Since 2009, I have been at meetings demanding that SMMUSD enact dark skies policies. From the very start of discussions over Measure BB, in 2009, I was telling the SMMUSD people that they had to get their house in order at MHS and Juan Cabrillo. The SMMUSD has been infuriating. The lighting plan they came up with last summer ignored the findings by parent volunteers and others . If they had listened to us, and come up with what the city is now demanding anyway, they would have their permits already. At Trancas, I spoke publicly and wrote that the lighting plan appeared to be aimed at lots of low-intensity, low-height fixtures -- a laudable goal. I said the large amount of illumination of the side walls of the shopping center was a problem. And I said the existing gas station glare was a problem that still needs fixing. The city staff informally agreed. The developer is going back to redesign,. I am confidant everyone will be happy.
John Mazza October 26, 2012 at 08:33 PM
Again, you should check your facts. Most of what you said here is not true.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »