A 19-month California Watch investigation, which was released Thursday, uncovered holes in the state's enforcement of seismic safety regulations for public schools. Some schools may have been inadequately retrofitted, while more recent construction projects may not have received final state certification.
California began regulating school architecture for seismic safety in 1933 with the Field Act, but data taken from the Division of the State Architect’s Office shows 20,000 school projects statewide never got final safety certifications. In the crunch to get schools built within the last few decades, state architects have been lax on enforcement, California Watch reported.
A separate inventory completed nine years ago found 7,500 seismically risky school buildings in the state. Yet, California Watch reports that only two schools have been able to access a $200 million fund for upgrades.
The investigation includes the following Santa Monica schools, and says the following about their reported conditions:
• : near one or more seismic hazards
• : one Letter 4 project
• : one AB300 project
• : one Letter 4 project
• : near one or more seismic hazards
• : one Letter 4 project
• : one Letter 4 project
• : near one or more seismic hazards
• : one Letter 4 project
According to California Watch, AB 300 implies "potentially dangerous seismic hazards that require more detailed evaluation," while Letter 4 is "the most serious designation by the state architect's office for school construction projects with safety-related deficiencies under the Field Act."
For more information, you can check out California Watch's comprehensive map page, or individual map pages for Santa Monica or each aforementioned school:
In a 2002 seismic safety survey done by the DSA, a regulatory body that oversees the construction of public schools, more than 650 schools in the Los Angeles Unified School District were designated as Category 2. These projects “require detailed seismic evaluation to determine if they can achieve life-safety performance," according to the DSA's website.
The 2002 survey, ordered by Assembly Bill 300, looked at schools constructed prior to 1976, when the modern California Building Code went into effect. Those schools may not have been constructed with modern safety standards.
A specific list of Category 2 schools was sent to each district in 2008, with a request to inspect the schools, update the paperwork, or retrofit as necessary.
“After the list was released, we looked at all the buildings we had, and there were several things to do. First was an evaluation of the building structure and the building construction and determination of how close it is to a fault—and then prioritization, as far as those buildings are concerned, taking into consideration age, occupancy and everything else,” said Neil Gamble, director of maintenance and operations for LAUSD.
According to Gamble, three schools in the district were located within 50 feet of fault lines. Two schools, Burbank Middle School and Osceola Elementary, have been retrofitted. The third, University High, is in construction now.
District officials denied to Patch that there are any safety issues, although the district still has not provided adequate documentation to the state that the rest of its schools are safe.
"We absolutely consider safety to be one of our highest priorities, the safety of staff and students,” Gamble said. “We don't open schools unless we are convinced that they are safe."
Eric Lamoureux, the acting deputy director for the Department of General Services, which oversees the DSA, agreed. “The districts have made the choice that they believe it is safe to occupy, and they haven't done that in a vacuum,” he told Patch.
As mandated by the Field Act, school officials must meet with architects and inspectors before and during construction of any school. Architectural plans must be inspected and approved, and the state requires on-site inspectors during the construction process.
The Field Act was ground-breaking legislation that regulated school structural standards for seismic safety. It was created a month after a 6.5-magnitude earthquake struck Long Beach on Mar. 10, 1933, killing 120 people. The earthquake, which hit at 5:55 p.m., damaged or destroyed dozens of schools. The death toll would likely have been much higher had the quake occurred during the school day.
California Watch’s review of data from the DSA’s office shows 20,000 school projects statewide have never received final safety certifications required under the Field Act. In the crunch to get schools built within the past few decades, state architects have been lax on enforcement, California Watch reports.
A separate inventory completed nine years ago found 7,500 seismically risky school buildings in the state. California Watch reports that only two schools have been able to access a $200 million fund for upgrades. The funds were provided under Proposition 1D, a 2006 ballot measure that set aside money for schools from the kindergarten to university level for the repair and construction of facilities.
“We have one building that fits the criteria for that, and we are pursuing Prop 1D funds for that school,” Gamble said.
The AB 300 Category 2 designation is not the only way schools are running afoul of state regulation.
The LAUSD also has a number of school building projects listed as Letter 3 or Letter 4, state designations that indicate buildings have not received final certification by the DSA, according to the California Watch report. However, both the district and the DSA’s office told Patch that there were a number of reasons a project would fail to meet the documentation criteria, while maintaining structural integrity. In some cases, changes to the original plans were made during construction, which requires another layer of documentation, although on-site inspectors would have signed off at the time. In other cases, districts may have outstanding bills with the contractor or inspector and are unable to get the necessary documentation. There is also an added fee involved with reopening a project that has been given a Letter 4, with no benefit to the school.
According to California Watch, one Northern California school in Letter 4 went without fire alarms for more than a decade. Other Letter 3 and Letter 4 schools are simply missing the necessary paperwork for architectural sign-off.
“We don't believe there are any significant safety issues with any of the Letter 3 projects,” Lamoureux said.
“Letter 4 projects, by definition, had a safety or structural deficiency issue noted during construction. On those projects, we don’t have any information that the issue was resolved, so we have no way of knowing right now whether the issue is still present or not,” Lamoureux said.
“We've looked preliminarily at the files. We don’t believe, at least with the information we have, that they present an egregious situation,” he said. "If it was an egregious situation, we would consider taking that project forward to the Attorney General or local District Attorney.” The DSA has no authority to take any action once construction has stopped.
Projects that closed with a Letter 4 designation cannot undergo further construction until documentation is provided that the required improvements have been made. Without expansion plans or state funds to support such work, schools have little incentive to change their Letter 4 status.
The California Watch investigation raises concerns that recent budget cutbacks have limited the number of inspectors who provide oversight on construction sites. A Jan. 12 letter from the DSA’s regional manager for Los Angeles, Shaf Ullah, identified 112 projects in the LAUSD where the assigned inspector had been laid off and not replaced. In March, 14 projects were issued an order to comply by the state.
This story was produced using data provided to Patch by California Watch, the state's largest investigative reporting team and part of the Center for Investigative Reporting. Read more about Patch's partnership with California Watch.
Patch will continue to report on any developments with this story.
