.
Feedback

School Board Challengers: 'Everybody Will Have a Voice'

Candidates from Malibu say they are running to bring excellence back to all schools in the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District. Incumbents and all current board members live in Santa Monica.

Three Malibu school board candidates say they want to bring much needed reforms to the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District to give everyone in the district a voice.

“The overarching message is that we are going to bring change to business as usual [at the district]. People will have a voice. Everybody will have a voice,” Malibu candidate Seth Jacobson said.

Craig Foster, Karen Farrer and Jacobson, all of Malibu, are vying to unseat incumbents Ben Allen, Jose Escarce and Maria Leon-Vazquez in the  Nov. 6 election. (Monday is the last day to register to vote.) The candidates will meet up in the final debate before the election on Wednesday, Oct. 24 at Pepperdine University.

Representation

Malibu's lack of voice on the board of education has long been an issue of contention. The last Malibu resident to serve on the school board was Kathy Wisnicki, who chose not to seek reelection in 2008.

“What’s interesting is people are coming up to us from communities we wouldn’t expect to be sympathetic saying, ‘I think it is time for a change,’” Foster said.

The Malibu candidates say they are not just running to represent Malibu schools, and some in Santa Monica have noticed. Some members of the group, mainly Foster, have garnered support from a number of Santa Monica residents and education activists, including SMMUSD Financial Oversight Committee (FOC) Chair Carrie Wagner, former FOC Vice Chair Joan Chu, FOC members Shelly Slaugh and David Vukadinovich, Santa Monica residents Ann Hoover and Kim Moran, co-chair of the Parent Learning Resource Network. Both Vukadinovich and Chu noted they have only endorsed Foster.

Getting our message out is the key. When people listen to us, they get it immediately. It’s not us against them. It’s about the kids. It’s about achievement. It’s about lower class sizes,” Jacobson said.

In the final weeks before the election, the candidates are focusing on reaching residents in Santa Monica and Malibu who are not parents and are not engaged with schools, according to Foster.

“There is a certain population in Santa Monica, we could be offering gold bars and they wouldn’t vote for us,” said Foster, who has a M.A.A. in Elementary Education, and is the parent of a fourth grade student in Malibu.

Foster said he believes some district actions have alienated voters in both communities over the years.  

Farrer pointed to facility and technology needs that were identified from 10 years ago were put on the project list for Measure ES, a $385 million school bond measure.

“It showed to me a cavalier attitude of let’s just cut and paste,” Farrer said.

Foster said the board may have “gone to the well too often” with requests to voters to pass bonds in the past.

“A community is a living entity that thrives on trust and faith and when people believe in what’s happening, you can pass bonds. When you betray that trust, it rapidly unravels,” Foster said.  

Farrer said she has noticed during the debates and other campaign events in Santa Monica that the Malibu slate has “a lot of supporters in Santa Monica.

She said she's found some in Santa Monica feel as left out in the district as many in Malibu have over the past several years.

“We are running from a place of sensitivity, inclusion and collaboration. Anybody who has not felt included, many of those people have come and approached us. They have that solidarity with us,” Farrer said.

Listening

If elected, all three plan on engaging in a listening tour.

“We’re going to listen to anybody, everybody who has an organized voice in the community,” Foster said, adding that the identified needs will be used to develop a plan to increase educational success for every child in the district.

The trio's reforms include reducing the administrative bureaucracy, making student achievement the primary goal of the superintendent, closing the achievement gap between different demographic groups and initiating a school-by-school review and holding principals responsible for learning outcomes.

“If [the incumbents] lose this election that is an incredible indictment of how off track they have become,” Foster said.

Incumbent Ben Allen, who was elected in 2008, said he is running again because he recognizes that more work is needed to make sure the district is at its full potential.

"While most districts have slashed and burned nursing positions, counseling, the arts and music, PE, summer school, and libraries, we’ve protected those programs and kept class sizes far smaller than most California districts," Allen said.  "So I’m proud of the work that has been done."

He said he has worked hard to make sure he has listened to all schools in the district, including in Malibu.

"I work really hard to be out there, going to meetings, sports events, and assemblies, talking to as many people as I can and taking folks’ opinions into account," Allen said. "... I work hard at being a bridge builder."

Incumbent Jose Escarce said the board has sought to improve communication with residents across the district, but that he has mainly seen "impressive and gratifying support from the voters."

"Our schools receive enormous support from our voters, including both parents and voters without children, which reflects the importance community members place on education, the regard they hold for our schools and the confidence they have in the school board," Escarce said. "Many voters know that our school board always places the needs of students first, and they vote accordingly when we put measures before them and explain the need."

'On Track'

Escarce also said he believes the school board is on track, even in the wake of funding cuts.

"Our schools have improved tremendously since I joined the board, and they are better now than ever before. Academic achievement has risen in all schools and all student groups, and we have raised the level of academic rigor, strengthened our music and arts programs, and reduced overcrowding in our schools by modifying our permit policy," Escarce said.

He said he believes the current board made financially responsible budget cuts.

"There is no question that we have more work to do to create schools that enable all students to achieve their potential. If I am re-elected, my main focus will continue to be providing an excellent education to all students and taking the necessary steps to continue to close the achievement gap," he said.

Maria Leon-Vazquez did not respond to interview requests in time for publication.

A final debate featuring the candidates is set for Wednesday, Oct. 24 at Pepperdine University in Malibu. The forum will be moderated by Malibu Patch Editor Jessica Davis and sponsored by Malibu Rotary. The community is encouraged to send questions they have for the candidates by Tuesday to malibu@patch.com.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Santa Monica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Eddie Greenberg May 8, 2013 at 09:09 pm
Thank you Marilyn Wexler. I totally agree with all that you have said in this eloquent letter. SMPDRead More have done well in DUI checkpoints for the past few years and they are appreciated for doing so. We are all better off for their efforts!
Aaron Mirsky April 11, 2013 at 06:26 pm
Great letter! Mr. Hill, you have a wonderful perspective and attitude. I am relatively new hear, myRead More family moved to Santa Monica in 1976. I cherish my memories at Santa Monica Beach and hope to continue to "refresh my soul" for many years to come.
Steven Rosen April 10, 2013 at 01:43 pm
Beautiful letter and I under his perspective. But I think if you look at the Quality of Life from aRead More generic standpoint (if there is such a thing), I don't think we headed in an upward trajectory. I cannot imagine more traffic, and new skyline created by tall buildings and newly-required traffic management to make the Quality of Life better for any of us.
Stodj April 9, 2013 at 04:41 pm
Lovely comment. I sense from your letter a new perspective on why this growth is happening, besidesRead More the $ involved, everyone needs to refresh their souls in this time of history and Santa Monica does that...at least at the beach where, hopefully, building will not progress. We do need to focus on halting the height of buildings as that will seriously change the environment here. Thanks, Michael.
karen April 11, 2013 at 11:02 pm
I left Santa Monica in 1987. I went to Samohi and Lincoln, worked at Sears and loved the small townRead More feel. Yes it's changed, but so has everywhere else. If my kids were young enough to drag along I would move there in a heartbeat. If you don't like it anymore, don't visit. I don't really understand why anyone would write to a local media outlet and complain about the town. How insulting. I'll take SM over the Bay area (talk about expensive!) any day.
SantaMonicaNative April 8, 2013 at 07:02 pm
Continued (sorry) The city changes. More people, more housing needed. More people more cars, moreRead More traffic, more trash, more dogs. Next we get the commercial builders who see Santa Monica as a cashbox. In city where 10 stories is tall, we get money hungery people who don't live here, who think 20 stories is better. That's where we are now. A turning point in the city. Once you build them you can't take them back. The city will change even more with the Expo line. We can't stop change, we can't restrict building except through zoning. We can temper it. What we can do is shop locally to save the few local businesses that remain and call City Hall on over ambitious projects. Speak up! It's frustrating-they don't listen but eventually they can be voted out. Don't let Santa Monica turn into Beverly Hills by the sea. We need normal businesses we can afford. Places to eat that you don't need a loan. Stop voting for group politics, read the ballot, get involved, even if only on a personal level. Know your city, don't just complain.
SantaMonicaNative April 8, 2013 at 06:47 pm
My parents loved Santa Monica, the first place i remember was a huge old house on 4th and MontannaRead More which had been subivided into units. If my parents had kept all the properties they owned in this city, i'd be rich. That said i must admit i still love Santa Monica. Go back to any city you grew up in and you will be shocked by the change. Part of the change has to do with the congested state if Caliornia. There are more people, no doubt of that. The other thing is memory tends to blur the facts. The things that matter to an adult are meaningless to a child. There are so many things that have disppeared from this city but they have been replaced by other things. Nothing but bugs are ixed in amber,cities can't be. In addition to that, Santa Monica has not grown in a natural fashion. The City Council has intervened in the natural growth of the city with laws, taxes and programs to fashion a city THEY want, not necessarily what would have been. The city has been pushed into a schitzophrenic combination of high ideals and directed outcomes. Rent control remade the city, changing it from a city with children and families to single renters. Vacancy decontrol helped to change that. Mom and pop owners are almost gone. Few small businesses can exist here, they can't compete with chains The city favors tenants over landlords, lawyers are expensive so properties get sold, torn down and replaced by multiple units. Low income housing increases the density of neighborhoods.
Steve Herbert April 10, 2013 at 08:12 pm
Many folks say the biking is not for them, therefore it can't work for everyone. What should theyRead More should say is it may not work for them but if a larger percentage of those who can ride would, the total numberof drivers would be reduced as more of them are out of their cars and riding bikes. Also consider if you can afford to drive a car you very likely can afford an electric bike. These "hybrids" are a nice blend of an electric motor with a bicycle which can provide as much or as little assistance as the rider prefers. As they still qualify as bikes so you can use and benefit from the bike lanes, but as they are electric they can help those with arthritis, sciatica and other people make the impossible, possible.
RJ April 9, 2013 at 06:18 pm
...ditto Paul!
RJ April 9, 2013 at 06:17 pm
.....Barbara, you forgot to add the need to eliminate about half of the population in Santa MonicaRead More before one could "rediscover" the sleepy beach town it used to be. Then don't forget the other "bike riders" that drive just a crazy as some automobile drivers....failing to abide by the rules of the road...and law! Unfortunately city officials have been trying to squeeze 10 pounds of garbage into 5 pound bags for the last 20 years....then come up with bright ideas like proposing to build movie theaters that enter/empty right on to 4th Street at Arizona (after tearing down the City parking garage) were we all know every idiot that has been issued a driver's license will stop and hold up traffic to drop off their kids...only to return to do it all over again when picking them up. Heaven forbid their kids have to walk from a block away where the parent could avoid blocking traffic on one of the busiest main thoroughfare streets in the city. I’m sure you could come up with many more examples of the most insane development that has happened or is proposed to happen. So Barbara......where is that area with "no congestion"???
Jonathan Friedman April 10, 2013 at 04:08 am
Good luck Jessica. Watch out for Jerry.
unknownauthor April 10, 2013 at 01:47 am
Don't correct it Jerry - it's very you and we all knew what you meant- and it was fine
Jerry Rubin April 10, 2013 at 01:16 am
CORRECTING my previous comment: Welcome Jessica!
Chris Loos April 4, 2013 at 04:00 pm
When the Expo line is complete and people start using it to travel back and forth from Santa MonicaRead More to DTLA, I think the idea of going without a car (or getting by with 1 car per household instead of 2) will seem mainstream to many more people.
Michael April 4, 2013 at 03:33 pm
3) Getting folks to part with their cars is like forcing divorce upon a couple rapturously in loveRead More 40 minute commute from Santa Monica to Downtown LA on the Expo Line!! Where do I sign up? I will be one of the first to move to a residence within walking distance of a Santa Monica Expo Station. If not having a parking space makes my rent cheaper I have no problem selling my car.
Chris Loos April 4, 2013 at 01:43 pm
Great article Juan!
Glenn E Grab March 30, 2013 at 02:12 pm
last week it took me 1 hour and 15 minutes to go from Sepulveda and Culver to the Lemlee Theatre onRead More 2nd street at 3:30 on Sunday afternoon...I can ride my bike there in 30 minutes...the only reason I took my car was because I went with two friends...one of whom was temporarily on crutches..we griped at him the whole evening..
mimi March 29, 2013 at 02:22 am
There is another travel option for the disabled called Access Services. They transport all over losRead More angeles and neighboring suburbs. You may want to check them out. You are fortunate to have a friend who transports you around instead of riding with WISE, which you dislike.. You could be of great help to your friend if you used Google Directions (before you leave home) to find various routes to your destination. I am familiar with the Chez Jay location on Ocean Ave. There are better and worse ways to get there. I suggest you choose better. Of course, this requires advance planning and a bit of home work. Think of all the aggravation you will save yourself and your friend. The choice is yours.
Dan Charney March 29, 2013 at 02:21 am
Well said- I never go downtown - haven't for almost ten or more years- once every few years I go toRead More the Genius Bar- take the bus-( which no longer runs on my street)- I have been going to Chez Jay almost 40 years or more- I used to work out on the bluffs- can't do any shopping anywhere near Wilshire or Montana- I can walk to Main - get my groceries at night- what is happening here is no different than what is happening in Congress and to our entire country- the rich are doing as they wish - the rest of us can die- the building that will be gone soon will be any with low income tenants and shabby houses- all gone