.

School Board Challengers: 'Everybody Will Have a Voice'

Candidates from Malibu say they are running to bring excellence back to all schools in the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District. Incumbents and all current board members live in Santa Monica.

Three Malibu school board candidates say they want to bring much needed reforms to the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District to give everyone in the district a voice.

“The overarching message is that we are going to bring change to business as usual [at the district]. People will have a voice. Everybody will have a voice,” Malibu candidate Seth Jacobson said.

Craig Foster, Karen Farrer and Jacobson, all of Malibu, are vying to unseat incumbents Ben Allen, Jose Escarce and Maria Leon-Vazquez in the  Nov. 6 election. (Monday is the last day to register to vote.) The candidates will meet up in the final debate before the election on Wednesday, Oct. 24 at Pepperdine University.

Representation

Malibu's lack of voice on the board of education has long been an issue of contention. The last Malibu resident to serve on the school board was Kathy Wisnicki, who chose not to seek reelection in 2008.

“What’s interesting is people are coming up to us from communities we wouldn’t expect to be sympathetic saying, ‘I think it is time for a change,’” Foster said.

The Malibu candidates say they are not just running to represent Malibu schools, and some in Santa Monica have noticed. Some members of the group, mainly Foster, have garnered support from a number of Santa Monica residents and education activists, including SMMUSD Financial Oversight Committee (FOC) Chair Carrie Wagner, former FOC Vice Chair Joan Chu, FOC members Shelly Slaugh and David Vukadinovich, Santa Monica residents Ann Hoover and Kim Moran, co-chair of the Parent Learning Resource Network. Both Vukadinovich and Chu noted they have only endorsed Foster.

Getting our message out is the key. When people listen to us, they get it immediately. It’s not us against them. It’s about the kids. It’s about achievement. It’s about lower class sizes,” Jacobson said.

In the final weeks before the election, the candidates are focusing on reaching residents in Santa Monica and Malibu who are not parents and are not engaged with schools, according to Foster.

“There is a certain population in Santa Monica, we could be offering gold bars and they wouldn’t vote for us,” said Foster, who has a M.A.A. in Elementary Education, and is the parent of a fourth grade student in Malibu.

Foster said he believes some district actions have alienated voters in both communities over the years.  

Farrer pointed to facility and technology needs that were identified from 10 years ago were put on the project list for Measure ES, a $385 million school bond measure.

“It showed to me a cavalier attitude of let’s just cut and paste,” Farrer said.

Foster said the board may have “gone to the well too often” with requests to voters to pass bonds in the past.

“A community is a living entity that thrives on trust and faith and when people believe in what’s happening, you can pass bonds. When you betray that trust, it rapidly unravels,” Foster said.  

Farrer said she has noticed during the debates and other campaign events in Santa Monica that the Malibu slate has “a lot of supporters in Santa Monica.

She said she's found some in Santa Monica feel as left out in the district as many in Malibu have over the past several years.

“We are running from a place of sensitivity, inclusion and collaboration. Anybody who has not felt included, many of those people have come and approached us. They have that solidarity with us,” Farrer said.

Listening

If elected, all three plan on engaging in a listening tour.

“We’re going to listen to anybody, everybody who has an organized voice in the community,” Foster said, adding that the identified needs will be used to develop a plan to increase educational success for every child in the district.

The trio's reforms include reducing the administrative bureaucracy, making student achievement the primary goal of the superintendent, closing the achievement gap between different demographic groups and initiating a school-by-school review and holding principals responsible for learning outcomes.

“If [the incumbents] lose this election that is an incredible indictment of how off track they have become,” Foster said.

Incumbent Ben Allen, who was elected in 2008, said he is running again because he recognizes that more work is needed to make sure the district is at its full potential.

"While most districts have slashed and burned nursing positions, counseling, the arts and music, PE, summer school, and libraries, we’ve protected those programs and kept class sizes far smaller than most California districts," Allen said.  "So I’m proud of the work that has been done."

He said he has worked hard to make sure he has listened to all schools in the district, including in Malibu.

"I work really hard to be out there, going to meetings, sports events, and assemblies, talking to as many people as I can and taking folks’ opinions into account," Allen said. "... I work hard at being a bridge builder."

Incumbent Jose Escarce said the board has sought to improve communication with residents across the district, but that he has mainly seen "impressive and gratifying support from the voters."

"Our schools receive enormous support from our voters, including both parents and voters without children, which reflects the importance community members place on education, the regard they hold for our schools and the confidence they have in the school board," Escarce said. "Many voters know that our school board always places the needs of students first, and they vote accordingly when we put measures before them and explain the need."

'On Track'

Escarce also said he believes the school board is on track, even in the wake of funding cuts.

"Our schools have improved tremendously since I joined the board, and they are better now than ever before. Academic achievement has risen in all schools and all student groups, and we have raised the level of academic rigor, strengthened our music and arts programs, and reduced overcrowding in our schools by modifying our permit policy," Escarce said.

He said he believes the current board made financially responsible budget cuts.

"There is no question that we have more work to do to create schools that enable all students to achieve their potential. If I am re-elected, my main focus will continue to be providing an excellent education to all students and taking the necessary steps to continue to close the achievement gap," he said.

Maria Leon-Vazquez did not respond to interview requests in time for publication.

A final debate featuring the candidates is set for Wednesday, Oct. 24 at Pepperdine University in Malibu. The forum will be moderated by Malibu Patch Editor Jessica Davis and sponsored by Malibu Rotary. The community is encouraged to send questions they have for the candidates by Tuesday to malibu@patch.com.

Sarah Lend October 22, 2012 at 02:00 PM
Really? The challengers state every voice will be heard but in reality, they are running two different campaigns. One for Malibu and one for Santa Monica. And if you live in Santa Monica, don't believe these three will care about your children. Their primary goal is to separate from Santa Monica and to destroy our new policy of equitable fund raising so they can ensure their private like schools. Those people who are supporting them from Santa Monica also do not like the new policy and since it passed, rather than roll up their sleeves and get to work, have tried to undermine the efforts of all of us who want each and every child to have an excellent experience in the classroom. Read between the lines and don't be duped by 3 people who are well funded by their own money and plan to buy their way into controlling policy. That's now what is best for ALL children.
Barbara Inatsugu October 22, 2012 at 03:48 PM
Thanks for the article. I would encourage everyone to watch the replay of the Board of Education Candidates Forums on cable Channel 3 in Malibu and cable Channels 16 and 99 in Santa Monica to hear what the candidates have to say. Both forums will show in both cities. Listen, watch, and make your own decision as to the best candidates to vote for. The sponsors of the forums are the League of Women Voters of Santa Monica and the Santa Monica-Malibu PTA Council, in partnership with the City of Malibu and Santa Monica CityTV.
Rebecca Kennerly October 23, 2012 at 08:57 PM
Community for Excellent Public Schools (CEPS) is a decade-old broad-based all-volunteer political action committee dedicated to protecting local public schools in Santa Monica and Malibu. CEPS is committed to supporting voices and representation from all parts of our district and we are concerned about the dual messages of campaign slate, Farrer, Foster, and Jacobson. The message "From Malibu. For Malibu" is seen on signs throughout Malibu while their signs in Santa Monica do not include that slogan. This can only lead us to question the stated intent of this slate to truly represent all students throughout the Santa Monica-Malibu School District. We would hope for a more unifying message from candidates and demonstration that their desire to serve stems from a commitment to represent all students in the SMMUSD district. CEPS ultimately voted to endorse candidates Dr. Escarce, Ms. Leon Vazquez and Mr. Allen. This decision had much to do with these candidates proven track record of consistently working to ensure that all students in our district have access to an excellent education. With their strong focus on representing every student in Santa Monica – Malibu schools, they have shown extraordinary leadership in focusing goals for the district, in particular in helping support initiatives to close the achievement gap. CEPS strongly supports School Board candidates, Ben Allen, José Escarce and Maria Leon Vazquez, for re-election this November.
Robert Marley October 24, 2012 at 12:19 AM
What a laugh. CEPS is a clubby, political organization that doesn't really care about the schools. Escarce, Leon Vazquez and Ben Allen have done a terrible job.. Say what you will, but the Malibu schools outperform Santa Monica Schools. The achievement gap is worse than ever, here. Under Escarce's and Leon-Vazquez's 12 year reign, only 6% of male African-American high school students are proficient in math and 14 percent of African American high school females are proficient in math accoridn to the SMMUSD's own 2012 Student Achievement study. Asian students have 64 and 65 percent proficiency (females/males) while white females and males have 50 and 53 percent proficiency. That's really closing the achievemnt gap.Good work Jose and Maria. Then there's the $40-thousand drop in contributions to the equity fund, the constant financial crises necessitating tax and/or bond measures very other year, incoherent policies relating to abuse of children by teachers in the district and student racial issues.This board has been unable and unwilling to bring in outside revenues through smart business dealings with private corporations. The district has become a hotbed for leftist political agendas and CEPS is obviously confortable with this model which is why donations and achievement is down. Maybe CEPS calls this excellent public schools, I don't. CEPS is afraid of losing control and becoming even more irrelevant. Don't break up the club, better schools might result.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something