.
Feedback

LA Marathon Organizers Want This Year's Race to Be Pain-Free for Santa Monica

Alleviating parking problems, ensuring a more secure finish zone and not disrupting local businesses are top priorities, the marathon's director of operations says.

Practice makes perfect, as the saying goes. Last year, the LA Marathon finished in Santa Monica for the first time, per the newly implemented Stadium to the Sea route. Naturally, there were a few bumps in the road: Many spectators couldn't find parking, the finish zone was chaotic, and business was interrupted at some local establishments.

This year, the 26.2-mile race will once again conclude near the Pacific Ocean—but it will feature some alterations, as organizers say they've learned a few lessons since 2010. Changes include a tweaked finish line location, a safer finish zone and a different site for the .

Whereas the 2010 LA Marathon ended at Santa Monica and Ocean, for the 26th edition, the finish line will be a few blocks further north, at California and Ocean. A change to the first part of the race was actually the catalyst for the new finish-line location, LA Marathon Director of Operations Stacy Embretson told Santa Monica Patch.

Runners who participated in last year's marathon will likely recall the loop-and-a-half around Dodger Stadium at the beginning. They'll also probably remember the delay of the race. Those two things went hand in hand, Embretson said, as the starting gun couldn't be fired until all the cars and shuttles were parked.

Now, the course will omit the loop and incorporate parts of Chinatown and Little Tokyo instead. As a result of the new route, when the organizers remeasured the course, they discovered that the 26.2 marker fell at California and Ocean.

"We were hoping it would go all the way to Wilshire," Embretson said.

In the end, it appears that the finish line's location at California and Ocean is "a good thing logistically," Embretson said. Last year, after runners finished, they were directed to continue walking to Colorado and Ocean, and then down to the —which was problematic for all parties involved.

"It was challenging on our end to keep the finishing line secure," Embretson said, recalling the chaotic scene. Media swarmed Ocean, spectators had difficulty finding their family members and friends who had run the race, and some local businesses were interrupted.

Runners weren't too happy, either.

"The last thing a runner wants to do after finishing a marathon is walk up and down a steep ramp," Embretson said.

Accordingly, marathon organizers have been collaborating with the City of Santa Monica to create "a cleaner, more secure 'DMZ' zone," she said. Also, "We've been working closely with the pier tenants to keep them in the loop."

This year, "We will only allow runners and volunteers with credentials in [the finish zone]. And businesses won't be interrupted," Embretson said.

Similarly, this year, the post-race party won't be staged near the pier, at the parking lot. Instead, tents and vendors will be situated at the north lot of the , between Ocean and Main St. As was the case in 2010, the party will also feature storage pickup and massage areas.

Another priority, according to Embretson, has been alleviating the parking problems that plagued the marathon last year.

"We're trying to keep our runners out of the downtown structures" in Santa Monica and encourage them to park in the beach lots instead, Embretson said. "We have a few thousand participants doing that." (Roughly 25,000 runners are expected to run the marathon.)

In the end, Embretson said runners will be pleased with finishing in Santa Monica, as they generally were last year, despite the aforementioned issues. After all, nothing is more refreshing than being by the ocean after a grueling long-distance run.

"It doesn't get much better than this finish line," Embretson said.

While parking issues are being addressed at the Santa Monica finish line, they're also being tackled at Dodger Stadium. This year, only shuttles will be allowed to take the 110 North to Dodger Stadium, with other vehicles having to come in via the 5 Freeway instead.

Other changes to this year's LA Marathon include new, optional Facebook and Twitter features that will automatically update participants' accounts with their split times as they cross each mile-marker mat. And while the number of charities and sponsors is roughly the same as in 2010, there is one more variable as well: a forecasted 30 percent chance of rain. (Runners may recall some drizzle last year.)

The marathon will happen rain or shine, but Embretson said organizers are "putting plans in place in terms of extra tents" at the starting line. The tents that will be used for the pre-race expo on Friday and Saturday "can be repurposed as shelter," she said.

Whatever happens weather-wise, these things are for certain: The LA Marathon will start at Dodger Stadium, end in Santa Monica—and last 26.219 miles. There's no changing that.

Additional LA Marathon coverage on Santa Monica Patch:

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Santa Monica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
j pena May 23, 2013 at 09:19 am
The City Council and Planning Commission have given our city away to billionaire developers andRead More business. Developers should be footing the bills. They need to stop rolling over to the likes of Dell, owner of the Miramar, who ripped off the city for several million dollars already. Instead they are considering letting him build 150 5 million $ luxury condos at the Miramar. In a residential neighborhood, a 22 story eyesore at our city gate.
Eddie Greenberg May 8, 2013 at 09:09 pm
Thank you Marilyn Wexler. I totally agree with all that you have said in this eloquent letter. SMPDRead More have done well in DUI checkpoints for the past few years and they are appreciated for doing so. We are all better off for their efforts!
Aaron Mirsky April 11, 2013 at 06:26 pm
Great letter! Mr. Hill, you have a wonderful perspective and attitude. I am relatively new hear, myRead More family moved to Santa Monica in 1976. I cherish my memories at Santa Monica Beach and hope to continue to "refresh my soul" for many years to come.
Steven Rosen April 10, 2013 at 01:43 pm
Beautiful letter and I under his perspective. But I think if you look at the Quality of Life from aRead More generic standpoint (if there is such a thing), I don't think we headed in an upward trajectory. I cannot imagine more traffic, and new skyline created by tall buildings and newly-required traffic management to make the Quality of Life better for any of us.
Stodj April 9, 2013 at 04:41 pm
Lovely comment. I sense from your letter a new perspective on why this growth is happening, besidesRead More the $ involved, everyone needs to refresh their souls in this time of history and Santa Monica does that...at least at the beach where, hopefully, building will not progress. We do need to focus on halting the height of buildings as that will seriously change the environment here. Thanks, Michael.
karen April 11, 2013 at 11:02 pm
I left Santa Monica in 1987. I went to Samohi and Lincoln, worked at Sears and loved the small townRead More feel. Yes it's changed, but so has everywhere else. If my kids were young enough to drag along I would move there in a heartbeat. If you don't like it anymore, don't visit. I don't really understand why anyone would write to a local media outlet and complain about the town. How insulting. I'll take SM over the Bay area (talk about expensive!) any day.
SantaMonicaNative April 8, 2013 at 07:02 pm
Continued (sorry) The city changes. More people, more housing needed. More people more cars, moreRead More traffic, more trash, more dogs. Next we get the commercial builders who see Santa Monica as a cashbox. In city where 10 stories is tall, we get money hungery people who don't live here, who think 20 stories is better. That's where we are now. A turning point in the city. Once you build them you can't take them back. The city will change even more with the Expo line. We can't stop change, we can't restrict building except through zoning. We can temper it. What we can do is shop locally to save the few local businesses that remain and call City Hall on over ambitious projects. Speak up! It's frustrating-they don't listen but eventually they can be voted out. Don't let Santa Monica turn into Beverly Hills by the sea. We need normal businesses we can afford. Places to eat that you don't need a loan. Stop voting for group politics, read the ballot, get involved, even if only on a personal level. Know your city, don't just complain.
SantaMonicaNative April 8, 2013 at 06:47 pm
My parents loved Santa Monica, the first place i remember was a huge old house on 4th and MontannaRead More which had been subivided into units. If my parents had kept all the properties they owned in this city, i'd be rich. That said i must admit i still love Santa Monica. Go back to any city you grew up in and you will be shocked by the change. Part of the change has to do with the congested state if Caliornia. There are more people, no doubt of that. The other thing is memory tends to blur the facts. The things that matter to an adult are meaningless to a child. There are so many things that have disppeared from this city but they have been replaced by other things. Nothing but bugs are ixed in amber,cities can't be. In addition to that, Santa Monica has not grown in a natural fashion. The City Council has intervened in the natural growth of the city with laws, taxes and programs to fashion a city THEY want, not necessarily what would have been. The city has been pushed into a schitzophrenic combination of high ideals and directed outcomes. Rent control remade the city, changing it from a city with children and families to single renters. Vacancy decontrol helped to change that. Mom and pop owners are almost gone. Few small businesses can exist here, they can't compete with chains The city favors tenants over landlords, lawyers are expensive so properties get sold, torn down and replaced by multiple units. Low income housing increases the density of neighborhoods.
Steve Herbert April 10, 2013 at 08:12 pm
Many folks say the biking is not for them, therefore it can't work for everyone. What should theyRead More should say is it may not work for them but if a larger percentage of those who can ride would, the total numberof drivers would be reduced as more of them are out of their cars and riding bikes. Also consider if you can afford to drive a car you very likely can afford an electric bike. These "hybrids" are a nice blend of an electric motor with a bicycle which can provide as much or as little assistance as the rider prefers. As they still qualify as bikes so you can use and benefit from the bike lanes, but as they are electric they can help those with arthritis, sciatica and other people make the impossible, possible.
RJ April 9, 2013 at 06:18 pm
...ditto Paul!
RJ April 9, 2013 at 06:17 pm
.....Barbara, you forgot to add the need to eliminate about half of the population in Santa MonicaRead More before one could "rediscover" the sleepy beach town it used to be. Then don't forget the other "bike riders" that drive just a crazy as some automobile drivers....failing to abide by the rules of the road...and law! Unfortunately city officials have been trying to squeeze 10 pounds of garbage into 5 pound bags for the last 20 years....then come up with bright ideas like proposing to build movie theaters that enter/empty right on to 4th Street at Arizona (after tearing down the City parking garage) were we all know every idiot that has been issued a driver's license will stop and hold up traffic to drop off their kids...only to return to do it all over again when picking them up. Heaven forbid their kids have to walk from a block away where the parent could avoid blocking traffic on one of the busiest main thoroughfare streets in the city. I’m sure you could come up with many more examples of the most insane development that has happened or is proposed to happen. So Barbara......where is that area with "no congestion"???
Jonathan Friedman April 10, 2013 at 04:08 am
Good luck Jessica. Watch out for Jerry.
Paul S April 10, 2013 at 01:47 am
Don't correct it Jerry - it's very you and we all knew what you meant- and it was fine
Jerry Rubin April 10, 2013 at 01:16 am
CORRECTING my previous comment: Welcome Jessica!
Chris Loos April 4, 2013 at 04:00 pm
When the Expo line is complete and people start using it to travel back and forth from Santa MonicaRead More to DTLA, I think the idea of going without a car (or getting by with 1 car per household instead of 2) will seem mainstream to many more people.
Michael April 4, 2013 at 03:33 pm
3) Getting folks to part with their cars is like forcing divorce upon a couple rapturously in loveRead More 40 minute commute from Santa Monica to Downtown LA on the Expo Line!! Where do I sign up? I will be one of the first to move to a residence within walking distance of a Santa Monica Expo Station. If not having a parking space makes my rent cheaper I have no problem selling my car.
Chris Loos April 4, 2013 at 01:43 pm
Great article Juan!
Glenn E Grab March 30, 2013 at 02:12 pm
last week it took me 1 hour and 15 minutes to go from Sepulveda and Culver to the Lemlee Theatre onRead More 2nd street at 3:30 on Sunday afternoon...I can ride my bike there in 30 minutes...the only reason I took my car was because I went with two friends...one of whom was temporarily on crutches..we griped at him the whole evening..
mimi March 29, 2013 at 02:22 am
There is another travel option for the disabled called Access Services. They transport all over losRead More angeles and neighboring suburbs. You may want to check them out. You are fortunate to have a friend who transports you around instead of riding with WISE, which you dislike.. You could be of great help to your friend if you used Google Directions (before you leave home) to find various routes to your destination. I am familiar with the Chez Jay location on Ocean Ave. There are better and worse ways to get there. I suggest you choose better. Of course, this requires advance planning and a bit of home work. Think of all the aggravation you will save yourself and your friend. The choice is yours.
Dan Charney March 29, 2013 at 02:21 am
Well said- I never go downtown - haven't for almost ten or more years- once every few years I go toRead More the Genius Bar- take the bus-( which no longer runs on my street)- I have been going to Chez Jay almost 40 years or more- I used to work out on the bluffs- can't do any shopping anywhere near Wilshire or Montana- I can walk to Main - get my groceries at night- what is happening here is no different than what is happening in Congress and to our entire country- the rich are doing as they wish - the rest of us can die- the building that will be gone soon will be any with low income tenants and shabby houses- all gone